Quantcast
Channel: Secret Thirteen Interview – Secret Thirteen
Viewing all 60 articles
Browse latest View live

Secret Thirteen Interview – ASC

$
0
0


James Clements, publicly known as ASC, a British forward-thinking electronic music producer who is now residing in San Diego, United States, is probably one of the most prolific and honorable musicians in the drum and bass scene and beyond. While growing up in different areas of England, he analyzed Motown, techno and the sparkling UK hardcore scene and this made a big influence on his productions. In over a decade, he has released more than ten studio albums and sevenfold more EPs and singles on such record labels as Nonplus Records, Perc Trax, Samurai Red Seal, Exit Records and others. James curated his own label named Covert Operations Recordings which has published numerous vinyl & CD’s releases between 2000 and 2009. Since then Clements is focusing on his new imprint called Auxiliary that presents progressive and flexible electronic music. During the last couple of years, Clements has been exploring more experimental and innovative music sounding possibilities, by using individually gathered motives from such styles as IDM, downtempo to ambient and abstract. The year 2012 for Clements were seriously productive – three studio albums and several EPs featuring such artist as Sam KDC, Consequence, Synkro and Ulrich Schnauss.

Pirate radio stations, aesthetic in music creation, record label management subtleties and other no less important topics are covered in this sincere, perceptive and involving interview with a skillful music craftsman and mature person James Clements. There is no doubt that ASC exclusively recorded audio voyage for Secret Thirteen journal should be playing while reading the interview.

Since the very old times people migrate for various reasons including land, food, search for better life, war. You have also moved from UK to USA. Why do you think people migrate nowadays? Why did you move?

I can only speak for myself, but I was in the position where I met my now wife when I was in the USA for a DJ booking and decided I had nothing to lose by moving to the USA and giving it a shot. Fortunately for me, it worked out well, and we have been married for eight years this December.

How did the move from UK to USA influenced your sound? How does the change of places affect you in general?

I think if anything, it made me less stressed and a lot more laidback living in Southern California. That in turn provided a knock-on effect, I think. I also loved being away from the UK and scenes over there. I am very much a solitary person when it comes to production and music, so not having that influence or being surrounded by it was a positive thing for my production. The weather here is usually hot most of the year round as opposed to grey, overcast and wet in the part of England I was living before I moved here, so that also helped my mood and outlook in general.

What are the most important condition for the fruitful creative process? Is it special and proper environment, contract with record label, exciting offer? Or maybe all those things no longer matter when it comes to music?

For me, it’s having the right environment, the right workspace. I can’t work well in cluttered spaces, so I keep the studio clean at all times. My studio is in a converted garage, so it’s fairly spacious and I have a good energy in there. I also like to keep a tight knit group of artists that I work with closely for my label. This helps as we often bounce ideas and plans off each other. Inspiration for us all often comes from sending each other our music and striving to do better. Friendly competition is good for the creative process.

You were DJing on pirate radio stations. What do you think, how the concept of radio station and broadcast changed in the age of internet and social media? Does any pirate radio stations exist now? How did the meaning of the word “pirate” changed?

Good question. I believe the term originated from broadcasters taking to the seas to send their transmissions in the early 20th century and the term became synonymous with illegal broadcasts that became very popular in urban areas of the UK throughout the 1990′s. I’m not sure if any pirate stations exist anymore, but I’d think there are one or two still going in London. The internet changed a lot of things for underground music – for good and bad. It was a lot easier to broadcast over TCP/IP than via FM when the internet boom came, so people switched to that. Even now, it is a lot easier to get a license to net broadcast than it is to do the same over the radio.

Your music is very aesthetic and minimal, full of precise digitalization, many individual sonic modulations, but it was not always like that. How your creative techniques changed over time? How much do you try to develop yourself in music? Do you feel sentiments for hardware and do you use it in your music?

That’s correct. When I first started releasing music, I had the cheapest setup ever. Between 1999-2004, I was using a PC, amplifier and hi-fi speakers. Nothing more. Everything was done internally. Looking back now, and knowing what I know now (production wise), I have to laugh, but at the time, it was all about making do with what I had at my disposal and what knowledge I had. As you point out, it was not as complex and expansive as it is now and that was due to the fact that I was literally putting collages of samples together and seeing what happened. I got pretty good with that technique, to the point where I was releasing music on labels worldwide, and I do not know if I would have done things any differently if I had the chance to go back and do it again, but from a personal standpoint, I do look back and think some tunes were terrible and wish I had not released them! Having said that, it’s all one big learning curve and I am still learning every time I switch up the studio.

My setup is a lot different these days, as I have a number of hardware synths and other gear in my studio that I rely on for my sounds and inspiration. My knowledge of how to put music together has gotten better over the years and when you add to that all the machines and tricks I have learnt, then my techniques are a lot different now to how they were back when I started, obviously.

What release in you career received too little attention, even though you expected otherwise? What projects in your career were the most interested to work with and why? Maybe it was some non musical activities such as cinema, theater or some other inspiring collaboration.

I cannot think of anything that did not receive enough attention, but having said that, there are always periods where you expect the music to do better than it actually ended up doing. On the opposite end of the scale, linking up with Instra:mental and being an integral part of the Autonomic movement introduced my sound to so many new listeners from different genres. Both of my recent LP’s – “Out Of Sync” and “Nothing Is Certain” – were both high points in my career, as musically, they both said exactly what I wanted to say in exactly the way I imagined they would. It is always rewarding when a project comes to fruition in such a pleasing way.

What would you say is the balance between long-time ASC fans continuing to follow you through the website, and new fans who have been introduced to you first time through the web?

In all honesty, I’m not sure. There’s been many stages of evolution for the ASC sound, and I am sure at certain turning points I have lost fans and gained new ones. When starting out, I was very much into manipulating breaks and that was the main focus, but soon I grew tired of that and needed something else. I started to focus more on synthetic sounds and more of a drum machine approach, which no doubt upset fans of traditional breakbeats. This shift will have also happened when I stopped producing atmospheric drum & bass and hooked up with Nonplus. It’s all about cycles for me, as I can’t keep doing the same thing over and over. I often burn myself out on one thing for doing it for so long. I do not see this as a bad thing, but more of a warning sign telling me it’s time to move on, to find something new. These days, I find that happening less and less, as I am now writing a lot of different kinds of music, which keeps it varied and me happy.

How do you find the fact that many artists nowadays run their own labels? What, in your opinion, is well managed record label? What should not happen in it and what aims should it have? Elaborate on how you select the music for release. Do you more rely on established friendly relationships or do you tend to release fresh no-name talents?

This is an area where you will find many conflicting points, but in terms of running a small indie label, I am of the opinion that having a small artists forming the core of the labels identity and sound is a must. If you can find a small pool of talent that fits in with your vision, it is a lot easier to manage and communicate to these artists. That is something that I have learnt over time, with this being my second label that I have ran. As for the aims, mine has always been to strive to put out high quality material and keep inspiring our artists and fans alike. Selecting music is a lot easier when you have that relationship and drive there with your artists. I am fortunate to have a wealth of amazing music sent to me by the people involved, which has allowed for a very rich and rewarding release schedule over the years. It has been imperative for keeping Auxiliary in the public eye since it’s inception, and garnering kudos and respect. Running a sub-standard label does no one any favours.

It seems that you are a hardcore fan of science fiction. Tell us more about your favourite films, books, futurists, publications, social networks and similar things related to future. Tell us briefly about the most important ones and what do they mean to you as as individual and to your art.

As cliche as it has become, I have to cite Philip K. Dick and “Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?” and of course, the film “Blade Runner“. A lot of PDK’s work such as “Valis”, “Ubik”, “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale” (which inspired “Total Recall”), are all great reads. He has been a huge inspiration for my music and even my track titles on some occasions.

The Ghost In The Shell” movies and series are also a massive inspiration to me. A lot of anime in general is, and the more sci-fi it is, the more chances are I have seen it and loved it. Probably too many to list. As for other films, “Moon” would be up there. A brilliant film that I cite as one of my fave films of all time now.

More about ASC:
WebsiteFacebook


Secret Thirteen Interview – Orphx

$
0
0


Interview with OrphxPhoto by PAL.

Orphx, the Canadian duo of Richard Oddie and Christina Sealey, dare to go into many extremes of electronic music merging the mechanical/ futuristic pulse of techno, mathematic complexity of glitch/IDM, rawness and anger of industrial, subtle cold elegance of EBM. However, their sonic labyrinths are constructed in a very wise way, guiding listener along the path of their unpredictable rhythmics. We might compare them to a brutalist or futuristic architectural structures, that are inspiring, monumental, but at the same time frightening and intimidating. Concrete, glass, plastic collides like various different waveforms.

Their music suits for both body and mind. Listener can move to or just be immersed by the techno soundscapes of Orphx. In this interview Orphx discloses their methods of building their constructions, inspirations, musical contexts and other things related to their cold, monolithic, but very intensive world of sounds. Also exclusive Orphx mix for Secret Thirteen is coming out on December 31.

Orphx sound seems to merge industrial and techno influences. What do you think are the most essential connection points between first wave industrial and later techno music?

Rich: I think early techno was only indirectly inspired by industrial music but there have been a number of points over the last thirty years when those industrial influences have become more prominent. We began combining elements of industrial music and techno around 1995. We were inspired by early industrial artists like SPK and Throbbing Gristle, as well as second wave groups like Skinny Puppy and The Klinik. But we were also involved in the rave scene around Toronto in the early 1990s and we took a lot of influence from what we were hearing at those parties and from labels like Plus 8 / Probe, Underground Resistance and Basic Channel. One of the things that always drew me to techno was its mixture of utopian and apocalyptic themes and atmospheres. That dark side of techno, and its industrial roots, seems to come in and out of prominence and popularity in response to what is happening in the wider culture that surrounds it.

What do you think is the role of new technology in composing music? How is it important to you? Do you rely more on digital or analog sound?

Christie: We began using only a few pieces of equipment that we’d managed to collect: one synthesizer, an 8-bit sampler, an old drum machine, a reel to reel tape machine, and some microphones and effects pedals. We learned how to use basic sequencing with MIDI and learned how to build contact microphones, create feedback circuits, and build other simple machines for making sounds. We relied heavily on analog synths and hardware until around 2000, when we began to discover and incorporate more computer software for creating, processing and recording sounds. Around 2005, we started using Ableton Live to create a more dynamic approach to live performance, allowing us to improvise our sets in response to the crowd. More recently, I’ve been investing a lot of time and energy in modular synthesis and I’ve put together a system that is becoming more and more prominent in our studio work and live performances.

Are there any records that you think sound particularly different when performed live? Has the computer ever crashed during a performance?

Christie: Our performances have always been different from the recordings, since we always have some degree of improvisation and try tried to add new and different elements each time. Now our shows are always improvised, using elements from the studio recordings but reworking them. We have had minor accidents during performances but we both have enough going individually that we can cover for the other person. Though I remember one performance at an art gallery in Edinburgh in 2000 that had to end early when a faulty power converter began melting the mixer that we were using!

Rich: And the show in Prague where I blew up a power bar…

Orphx performing livePhoto by GAndy.

You seem very cosmopolitan, as your band has visited many countries across Atlantic. What would be the best show in your career? Where and why? Maybe they are related to your personalities or events of some period happening at the same time (e.g. John Cage first performance of 4’33” caused scandal and probably was one of the most memorable for him)?

Rich: We have been fortunate to play at a lot of great venues and events but I think my favourite gig was aboard the MS Stubnitz in 1998. This is a WWII era boat that has been converted into a mobile arts center and venue. It was docked in Stockholm that summer for a festival. It was one of our first performances in Europe and we opened up for Pan Sonic. I remember the hull of the ship vibrating from the bass frequencies. Beautiful.

Christie: Our recent show at Berghain was a great experience – an amazing club, crowd and sound system. Maschinenfest in 2001 was memorable in a different way because it was in an underground WWII bunker that was so hot and packed with people that sweat was dripping from the ceiling on to our equipment. And the US had just started bombing Afghanistan so we were really nervous about flying back home on a US airline.

In every band everyone has different responsibilities. Could you tell about your responsibilities in the band? Do you sometimes argue after your live shows, when one of you do something wrong or not according to the plan? What time did you need until you sorted things out and started working effectively together?

Christie: Our early recordings and concerts were totally improvised. I played a sampler and reel-to-reel tape loops, and Rich used a synth, drum machine and metal percussion. Our friend Aron West used an old Mac computer for sequencing and generating sounds. From about 1998 to 2008, most of the studio recordings were made by Rich. I would add sounds here and there and we collaborated on the live shows. For the last few years, starting with our first release on Sonic Groove, we have been collaborating on the studio recordings, sometimes working separately on tracks but often trading them back and forth. Rich excels at the arrangements and I enjoy creating sounds so this is often how the work gets divided. Currently, we have the best set-up for working together on live shows. None of it is pre-recorded so we do not have to worry so much about sticking to a set plan or accidentally deviating from it. We will have ideas about where we want the show to go but things are open to change depending on the crowd and we each have control over rhythms, samples and melodies to work on the fly. It is a lot more exciting and ideas that come out during live performances often find their way into new recordings.

Orphx performing live at Mutek festival, CanadaPhoto by Quintin Hewlett.

Orphx sound is quite intense, powerful, cold, even angry. What kind of emotions do you try to channel and what reaction do you expect from listener?

Rich: I think our music is a reflection of what we see around us. It’s a way of taking negative energy and emotions from daily life and working with them, transforming them. I think that those who enjoy our music also find this cathartic quality. I have always been attracted to music and art that takes a hard look at problems and challenges rather than trying to provide a distraction from them. It’s not about celebrating anger, fear or hate but about acknowledging that kind of energy and trying to work through it.

In Orphx sound, often referred to as techno, we might hear traces of industrial, abstract, glitch, reminiscent of architectural structures. Are you inspired by architecture in this case? Maybe you explore Russian architecture of cold war period or maybe you are fans of gigantic constructions middle Asia? Tell us about the objects you are interested in, the philosophy behind them, the way you feel it.

Rich: Our music is not directly inspired by architecture but I definitely took a lot of inspiration from the many industrial sites in this area, especially some abandoned sites near my house when I was a teenager. It’s obviously a cliche for someone who makes “industrial music” but those places really had a big impact on me. There is something mysterious, sad, and beautiful about large abandoned factory sites, when the structure and machines have decayed and vegetation and animal life has started to reclaim it. I have a real fascination for abandoned buildings like this.

Could you present the current situation in the Canadian electronic music scene? Maybe there are some interesting underrated artists? How everything developed during previous years? Maybe you missed something or, on the contrary, better conditions to spread music in various spheres emerged? What are the tendencies among listeners? Maybe the scene lacks something, some areas need improvement?

Rich: It’s hard to generalize about electronic music in Canada, or anywhere else, as there are lots of different scenes. In terms of “underground” electronic music, there are small but vibrant techno / house scenes in Montreal, Toronto and a few other cities. And Montreal hosts some very good electronic music festivals such as Mutek and Elektra. There are many artists who are operating outside of the mainstream / commercial trends that many people in North America now associate with “electronic dance music”. Vromb, Huren, Thoughts On Air and The Infant Cycle are some of the Canadian artists that I think deserve more attention.

In what things in music do you believe and don’t believe? What about its evolution progress or regress in terms of ideology and technology (performing)? How do you imagine listener and music evolution after 13 years? Maybe you could share your vision? How do you see yourself in it?

Rich: This is a pretty vast topic. Even if we are talking just about electronic music, I don’t think I can predicate what will happen over the next few years. I think there has been a general movement in live electronic music away from laptop playback and towards genuine live performance and improvisation, using controllers and/or hardware, and I hope that continues with new technologies for physically manipulating sound.

Christie: Hopefully, we will also see new ways for independent artists to make enough money to survive.

Ideally, where would you like to see your music used?

Christie: We make our music for clubs and home listening, but we are also quite keen to work on soundtracks and have our music used in more films.

When Thomas Stafford and Alexei Leonov met each other, they made their first symbolic handshake in space and it was wonderful gesture, that inspired moderate people of two powerful nations in times, when there was huge tension between those countries. What kind of personality would you like to meet? From whom would you like to receive some more knowledge, inward strength or courage? Why do you think that this personality would enrich you as a person or inspire you?

Rich: I’m not sure if there is a particular person that I would like to meet but it’s always a learning experience and often an inspiration to work with other people, and we’ve been lucky to have the opportunity to collaborate with some great artists.

Orphx performing at Kinetik FestivalPhoto by Chris Christian.

Can you tell us about the most memorable projects, names and record labels that helped you in your career? Could you also tell us about your future plans? With whom would you like to collaborate?

Christie: In the beginning, we connected with a lot of people that influenced our music and helped us out. Jim DeJong (aka The Infant Cycle) ran a cassette label called Doomsday Transmissions that introduced us to the tape trading culture that was active in the 1990s. That inspired Rich and Aron to start up Xcreteria, a cassette label and mail order distributor that Rich operated until about 1998. Our friend Praveer Baijal ran another label, Body and Blood, that released our first track on CD and he introduced us to a lot of new music, including labels like Sahko and Basic Channel which later had a big influence on our music. Body and Blood helped us connect with Malignant Records, who released our first CD, Fragmentation, in 1996. This release led to our long friendship with the Hands label, who have released much of our work since 1998.

Rich: Our movement into techno was facilitated by Adam X, who approached us after a concert in 2008. We instantly connected with him around the idea of bringing together industrial music and techno, and he invited us to start releasing on his revived Sonic Groove label. That has been a great relationship and Adam has become a good friend of ours. We’ve collaborated with a lot of artists over the years, including Mark Spybey (Dead Voices On Air), Jim DeJong (The Infant Cycle) and Adam Fritz (En Nihil). Aron and I have started working together again under the name Oureboros, and we’ve also started up a new project with our friend Dave Foster called O/H. Dave was another big influence for us. He’s released consistently excellent music under the names Teste and Huren, among others.

Christie: At the moment, we’re working on a new release for Sonic Groove and the first release on a new label that we’re launching next year. Plus more remixes and a collaboration with Ancient Methods that should come out next year as well. We’re also putting together another small European tour for the spring and will hopefully be playing in the US later in the year.

You are both teachers as well as musicians. What do you teach and does this influence your music?

Rich: I teach human geography and politics. Politics and philosophy have influenced my music for a long time and references to different topics are often in the song titles and samples that I use.

Christie: I teach visual art and I have recently started teaching electronic music recording and synthesis. I divide my working hours between music and painting, and find that they both influence each other.

What measures do you use to improve your productivity, creative process? Maybe you have some strange habits here like Albert Enstein, who used to find his stimulus, ideas and quietness for his calculations while playing violin. Or maybe inward concentration or inborn productivity, developed in your country over long period, is enough for your art? Could you elaborate on it?

Christie: Walking, mostly at night, and listening to the sounds around me. I will often hear a sound that inspires an idea for a sound or pattern in the studio.

Rich: Walking and listening, for sure. Reading – mostly horror, science fiction, philosophy. And lots of caffeine.

More about Orphx:
WebsiteFacebookBandcampSoundcloud

Secret Thirteen Interview – Loscil

$
0
0


Interview with electronic music artist LoscilPhoto by Mark Mushet

Loscil sound concept is quite explicitly inscribed in the title. Loscil is the blend of “looping” and “oscillator”. And you can certainly feel what Scott Morgan, the man behind the project, means by that when listening to his new album “Sketches from New Brighton“. Evolving loops here paint the picture of the forgotten place in Vancouver, where industry and nature merge into organic whole. This paradox quite accurately describes Loscil music, floating between electronic experiments and human warmth of acoustic or chamber sounds. Hypnotizing and beautiful repetition creates unique narratives and stories, that are so easy to immerse into.

Scott’s musical journey is also an interesting subject to talk to. While playing drums with indie/new wave conceptualists Destroyer, he dived into the depths of ambient/electronic sounds existing a bit further away from what he did before. In this exclusive interview, we not only tried to find out the parallels of this, but also chatted about utopias without recording technology, lucid dreaming, influence of fatherhood and other topics. We hope this interview will makes your waiting for Loscil exclusive mix for our journal even more impatient.

Your title stands for “looping oscillator”. What place does repetition occupy in your music? Do you employ it as a tool for creating? What does the concept of loop, repetition means to you?

Repetition – looping specifically – is an essential part of my process. When I compose electronically, I compose from a loop in real time. In this sense, I am building up by adding material or stripping away by filtering and editing to arrive at something I find pleasing to my ear. For me, the loop is a way to be in constant engagement with the material, always analyzing, modifying and adjusting. Once I get to a point I am satisfied with – once I can listen to a loop for long periods of time without tiring – then I know I have something. In many ways I have thought it would be ideal to release my music as loops, and this is certainly something I hope to explore.

buy Loscil album SubmersIn album “Submers” you use the pieces of classical music. What is you relation to classical music? Is it inspiration or source?

Both. I periodically listen to classical music and I studied it in university. I think, what I often long for and miss with electronic music is the warmth of the sound of acoustic instruments. In this sense, recorded classical music or the use of classical instruments such as strings or piano become about trying to find some of that warmth and couple it with the sometimes cold sounding electronic sounds. Synths have always sounded a bit cold and distant to me so in this sense I tend to avoid them for the most part and work with samples instead.

How do you find samples used in your music? What part of creative process does the searching take? Do you have some technique how to find them or do you just search randomly? Have you ever found something unexpected, that influenced your music taste? What would you never sample?

There is very little rhyme or reason to my process here. I do a lot of field recording but these do not always find their way directly into my productions. Sometimes, it is simply the act of listening that inspires me while recording. I do quite often use very short, clips of instrument recordings to use as impulse responses in convolution processing. Recording a note of any instrument such as a guitar, cello or piano or a snippet of some prerecorded music can often provide really interesting spectra to work with. Most often, when working this way, I am looking for interesting timbre and texture. In terms of unexpected sounds, yes. I have a broken old mini-cassete recorder that has always proven an interesting source for weird, unexpected sounds. I have garnered many odd and interesting percussive sounds using this device. In terms of what I would never sample? Hmm. Not too many rules here so long as the resulting sound in the music is something interesting and rewarding.

buy Loscil Sketches From New BrightonNew album is called “Sketches From New Brighton“. We see here an actual geographical name mentioned. Why Brighton? How do places you live or travel influence your sound and mind? What do you think about idea of psycho-geography (the influence of place to people’s mind)? How important are places to music in general?

In many ways it’s about the beauty of the mundane, the allure of the seemingly forgotten place. We have many points here in Vancouver where industry and nature meet and New Brighton Park is one of them. You have the inlet, spanned by a bridge, the shoreline carved for cargo ships, the wildlife coupled with grain elevators. I find the mundane nature of this place interesting, contemplative and in many ways, ambient. This works for me aesthetically. Of course, we always consider industry and nature at odds but here it works for me somehow. This is what my music is all about really. It’s about the machine but it’s also about finding something organic inside the machine. A balance of the technology and the quest for beauty. So in this sense, place is essential to the music but it is also simply a reflection of something that’s already there for me in the act of creating.

You used to play drums in Destroyer. It is more indie/new wave oriented band, although with experimental elements in sound and concept. What do you think, is there anything in common between Loscil and Destroyer? What do each of these projects means to you personally?

Generally speaking there is very little in common between Destroyer and Loscil, but there is a history there. Dan Bejar and I have been friends for years and have collaborated in many different ways over the years and there will always be that personal connection that brings our individual approaches to music together. I enjoyed my tenure as Destroyer’s drummer but I think I have gotten more out of our other collaborations.

Charles Baudelaire once said about poetry “Always be a poet, even in prose”. What about music industry? Is it possible to reach wider audiences being just a good producer? Have you ever had some help from outside in your successful career? Or do you work alone at the moment? Could you elaborate on what should remember and what should not do any young and promising artist?

Secret Thirteen Interview with LoscilIt is cliché, but I personally think it is important to just do what you do because you love it. Anything else related to the industry and career and all that should always come second. Yes, we all need to survive but if you are not making the art you want to experience in the world, then you have failed yourself. Beyond that, yes, you always need help to reach people. Anyone who says labels are dead is a fool. Labels do a lot for an independent artist. You need the press and the critics (though you do not need to listen to everything they say) and you need friends and community. After over 10 years releasing music as Loscil, I feel like I am still just getting started. I continue to make music because it’s something I’m passionate about. My goals are to make music and art that I’m personally satisfied with and hope someone out there gets something out of experiencing it.

Everybody knows whats happened after Adolf Hitler’s rejection from the Vienna Academy of Fine Arts. What, in your opinion, is one of the most important or unexpected human decisions ever made in history or, maybe even in these days? How does it influence us? Could share your “what if” thoughts (what if certain events had happened or had not happened).

Perhaps this is an obvious thought, but what if sound recording was never invented? What would western music be like today, even with this other technology around us? We currently would probably find it absurd to think of attaching a smell to an email and sending it to someone. What if it was just as absurd an idea to send a sound file? This is kind of interesting to me because my entire practice is based on the recording of sound. Digital or analogue, it does not matter. If I could not record sound and document my electronic music, would I still be a composer? In this sense, I think sound recording capabilities have made us all much more dependent on the record industry for music based entertainment. I imagine that without sound recordings, the tradition of

learning to play instruments and songs in the home would continue to be much more culturally central to our enjoyment of music. The concept of stealing music would largely not exist (with the exception of sheet music I suppose). File sharing as it pertains to music would be a non-issue. Live music likely would not be as amplified due to it not trying to imitate recordings. Lip-syncing would not exist. It is doubtful music would have as many superstars as it does as there would be fewer means for publicity without a recording to play on the radio or sales to aid in promotion. Music would be more intimate, small-scale, community-based, I imagine, and the notion of musical copyright would be vastly different. There would likely be more jobs for musicians in society to accompany events, films, etc. I am not saying I desire this, but it is an interesting “what if” for me.

The interesting fact is that we dream only what we know, what we see in our life. What are your connections to dreams? Do you analyze them or believe in them? Maybe you can tell the most extraordinary or the most scary dream you ever had? Explain your choice. Maybe in dreams you find inspiration for your art? Or maybe they helped to answer some questions you had?

I honestly cannot say that dreams have had a major influence on my artistic practice. Now that I have children, many of my dreams seem to be based around them and the predominant theme is the fear of losing them. Nightmares, really. Otherwise, I cannot say that there has been a dream of profound influence on me. I have had ideas come to me in dreams, but similar to ideas that come when under the influence of alcohol or drugs, I have usually realized they are bad ideas when my sober mind takes over. I have always liked the idea of dreams – but never found a way to tap into them. I suppose I am a lucid dreamer. I only dream when I am awake.

What it is to be a father? How it changed your life as a music producer? Would you like your child to follow your path?

I do not believe fatherhood has dramatically changed my approach to music, though it has certainly changed my life. When you had little people in your life, your own needs tend to take a bit of a back seat to the needs of the children. It has been challenging, but mostly rewarding as children experience things with such curiosity, open-mindedness and generous spirit. In this way, they have inspired me. I do not mind either way if they follow my path but I hope to instill in them a love for creativity and appreciation of the arts at the very least.

More about Loscil:
WebsiteFacebookTwitterWikipedia

Secret Thirteen Interview – Bvdub

$
0
0


Secret Thirteen Interview Bvdub

From the USA to China: the experience of Bvdub

Bvdub music is like rich and deep color layers on the canvas in abstractionist landscape. Abstract, yet beautiful. Minimal, yet evoking the maximum of emotions. Sometimes it feels very close, however at the same time it is very remote as if existing in some parallel universe, not connected to our world. It does not let itself to be squeezed into concepts, genres, definitions and exists beyond the boundaries of their limitations. This allows it to breathe, unfold, expand, spread its palette of gorgeous ambient soundscapes.

This elaborate interview can hardly be classified as such. It is rather a story of one man, running from the USA to China in order to escape its past and ….. music (however, he did not succeed). But, first of all, it is a very honest account on one’s experience and definitely one of the most sincere pieces we have read. Sometimes it even feels like a conversation with long time no seen friend. We hope this interview will makes your waiting for Bvdub exclusive mix for our journal even more impatient.

Your relocation to China seems to be quite an interesting move. What made you choose that country? What are the reasons for moving? How did it change your sound/lifestyle?

I chose China because I was really obsessed with Chinese history and culture at the time (most of which vanishes within two days of actually living here, like it would with any country you’ve built up way too much in your mind, I suppose), and was learning Chinese as well, so between that, and my self-induced exile from the decaying scene at that time in San Francisco, it made sense to basically start over. And where better to do so than a country 6,000 miles away that you have never even set foot in? So as with most my decisions at that time in my life, I hurdled myself into it without properly thinking it through, and within a couple months had sold everything I owned and woke up in China.

I originally moved here in an attempt to escape music – well not really music, but everything that surrounded it – after years of heartbreak at the hands of what a once beautiful scene had become. The idyllic goal was to basically start life again, a simple life devoid of all the baggage that my life in electronic music had left me with, and to try to forget the pain. Not surprisingly, it did not work, as 1) that heartbreak (and joy) of those times will never leave me, and 2) placing myself in a completely different environment only made music, and all the memories I wanted to escape, even more important. It should have come as no surprise that trying to leave my past life behind made it more important than ever. And made me realize that with all the good and bad, it would always be who I am.

That first move here was nearly 12 years ago now. Wow, I feel old. My time and life here has always affected my sound, I guess, as I actually started making my own music after I moved here, not before. So it’s always been a part of it. My music is just about my life, and what life means to me, and no matter my relationship with China, which is always different depending on the day you ask, I have spent a massive part of my life here, and it is going to come through in my music in some way. Even when my music talks about the past, and my very different life in a very different land, while I live here in the present and am remembering those days while standing in a place that could not have any less idea who I really am, or the life I have lived, is a very surreal phenomenon, but in a good way I think. And in recent years, much of my music also talks about the present, and has begun in many cases to take on a more direct narrative of much more recent events, and since my life is here now, those events are as well. No matter the reason, my music surely would not be the same otherwise.

As far as my lifestyle, I don’t think anything can change that. I’m the same manic-depressive, OCD-wrought misanthrope I have always been. No matter where I live I barely ever leave the house, so my lifestyle here is pretty much exactly the same just with a lot more scantily-clad girls around, when I do happen to venture out, which is ok in my book.

To what genre would you attribute the music you make? In general, what do you think about putting music into genres? Is it useful?

Actually it’s the diametric opposite of useful. I don’t know if they have ever been ‘useful’ per se, but I think genres at least made sense at one point, because it was all so new, and they weren’t a source of snobbery or derision, but were more of a way to describe the kind of place that particular music was coming from in general, but to be fair, back in the day there were pretty much only a few genres, and they were all pretty cut-and-dry. Nowadays, however, not only are they blurred and unclear (which to me is a good thing), but it seems the only purpose they seem to serve are to fuel arrogance and ignorance amongst people who claim to champion them, which really just equates to them hating on everything else. But really, this is unfortunately so much of where we find ourselves nowadays in electronic music. People only know how to attack what they hate, rather than just embrace what they love.

In the past, genres were just a general way of explaining what kind of music you were talking about, but they were not so exclusionary. A single genre could encompass many things, and you did not see people getting all worked up about it. In the past, they were a kind of celebration, a sense of pride of the kind of music you were a part of, and it was often something really embraced by artists themselves, as it was a proud part of their identity. But nowadays, personally I do not know any artists who give a shit about genres anymore. And for good reason.

Now, genres seem to serve more as a way to suffocate artists and their music, and they have just become a tool of everyone but artists, for everyone else to use for whatever completely non-musical end they seek to reach. Even more importantly, people seem to spend more time nitpicking over what genre something should be shoved into than actually listening to what the song has to say. Worry about actually listening to it first. who cares what genre it is, as long as you feel it? I think one of the most absurdly stupid things about all this genre madness of late is that it’s all decided by people who did not even make the music, who somehow deem themselves a greater expert on what the music is supposed to be classified as than the person who made it. I have had people on Discogs actually argue with me when I asked that a genre tag be changed – yes, you read right – argue with me about MY own music, and how apparently I don’t know how to classify it as well as they do. I don’t even know how to talk about that, it’s so beyond the pale of absurdity.

Back in the day, genres were not exclusionary, as a party had tons of different genres in a night, and people could enjoy all of them. Nowadays, they have been twisted into a way to exclude others from what you think is your secret club, or to lock artists in arbitrarily defined boxes, so people can either easily digest (or market) what they make. I just see no point. I think music is just way beyond that at this point, and the people who keep shoving genres down people’s throats are usually only doing so for their own benefit, whatever that may be.

Not to be a dick (which, like when anyone says that, means I’m going to be), but it seems that nowadays, genres are really the lifeboat of the ignorant. The massive majority of those I encounter in recent years who actually give a shit about genres are generally the absolutely least qualified to be talking about anything having to do with anything, much less deciding what something should be called. I think those who have either been around long enough to really know what’s important, or actually are in this whole thing (no matter their role, from artist to listener and anything in-between) for the right reasons are just so past caring about what something’s “called” that it’s not even funny. Personally, absolutely none of my personal friends in music, from other artists, to fans, or anyone else, ever mention genres. We just talk about music, and what moves us. Genres never come into the conversation. Either it connects with you or it does not. Who cares what arbitrary classification some random person you do not even know says it has to be stuck in? Especially when most of the people who spend all day trying to lock this song or that into some “genre” are so painfully ignorant of what that genre even means that it boggles the mind?

I understand that stores need to have some kind of genre classification, otherwise how would you even find music anywhere close to what you want to hear? It would take a week to find anything. I get it. But genres should just be used as a very broad, general guideline just to help someone have some idea what you are talking about, should the need arise – all this insanity with a hundred sub-genres, and spending all day figuring out which track gets stuck into which one is just, well, insanity. Enough already.

If anyone ever asks me what kind of music I make, I simply say ‘electronic music.’ But if I had to go further into a pre-defined genre(s), I guess I would say ambient and ambient techno, which to me really just means with or without beats. I think the latter encompasses a lot of things. I make anything from beatless ambient to 180bpm breaks, and everything in-between, but ambient is always the base.

Really though, at the end of the day, I do not think I fall into any genre. I just sound like me. I think you can hear one of my tracks from a thousand miles away and no matter what form it takes, the second you hear it, you know it’s me. So why should it be in a genre? It’s just me.

Are you classically trained? What kind of priority it is in electronic music?

Yes I’m classically trained, very much so, actually. I began playing violin at around 6, and piano around 7, and played each for close to 10 years. In the later years of my violin career, as it were, I also played in several orchestras, and was the youngest member of the city’s symphony, for which I played 2nd chair. By that time I had also composed a decent amount of my own music, both for solo violin, and also for trios with violin, viola, and cello.

By the time I reached high school, however, I decided that classical music did not fit in with my idiotic definition of what was ‘cool,’ and I ditched it all. Nowadays I cannot even read a note of music anymore, and play solely by ear, but the influence from those years still shines extremely heavily, which is ironic, considering I found it so unimportant at one point.

I do not think you need to be classically trained to make electronic music (obviously, people who are not do so every day), but it sure helps. Having classical training, especially in playing in symphonies, or other such combined efforts, really helps you to understand how music is constructed from the ground up, and the principles of so much of what has also carried over into all music, especially electronic, whether most people know it or not. Put it this way – I do not think classical training is necessary, but you can definitely tell the difference if someone’s had it… or has not.

Do you follow current trends in electronic music? How much time do you spend on searching for music? What music do you listen at home?

These days I am pretty much the least up-to-date person in the world when it comes to trends, or anything that I should probably know about electronic music. Part of that is intentional, as I keep myself in a self-imposed vacuum to make sure my heart and mind are free. If I keep up on what’s new and am always listening to new things, like it or not, some of that is going to slip into my subconscious, and influence what I’m doing. And I always want anything I make to be influenced purely by life itself – not someone else’s music.

The other reason is more pragmatic, in that I spend anywhere from 8-12 hours a day, nearly every day, working on music. It’s basically all I do with my life when I’m not torturing my poor students. So at the end of that, my ears are exhausted, and I usually opt for complete silence, TV, or video games.

That does not mean I don’t ever listen to new music, but it is admittedly nearly always either music that friends have made, or that friends have recommended. I do not search it out myself. Sometimes I feel guilty about that, like I really should be way more up on what’s happening, and I am surely missing out on tons of amazing music, but that’s just the way it goes I guess.

I am going to come off like a total self-absorbed prick when I say this, but honestly, I mostly just listen to my own music. And why not? It’s more a part of me than anything else, and resonates more with me than anything else, so it’s what I gravitate toward more than anything else. I also think it’s quite interesting to reverse the role in that way. To turn something I once created into something that I’m now experiencing from the other side and really it just makes me love it even more, as it’s then an even deeper part of my life. I have seen people attacking me before for charting my own music, and surely those people will also find me disgusting for saying I listen to my own music as well. But they can suck it. If you don’t love what you make more than anything else, I think you should sit down and ask yourself why you made it in the first place.

That being said, there are a lot of other artists I listen to quite regularly, but as I said, admittedly most of them are friends I know personally. It just makes the experience that much more meaningful. Other than that, if I am going to listen to something, I would say 90% of the time, it’s drum and bass. I have been a ridiculously huge drum & bass head since the old jungle days, and have never stopped. In fact, I have some on right now, haha.

How do you think album artwork affects the experience of the listener? Is there something lost when listener has nothing physical to look at and hold?

I think it can definitely affect the experience – at least it does for me. Pretty much every album or piece of music I have ever owned, I always associate it in my head with the image that accompanies it, and I think it definitely influences my interpretation of it. But while it definitely affects someone in the sense that it creates a strong association with that image, I do not think it will necessarily guide people where you want it to guide them – after all, they do not even really know why it is you chose that image in the first place. They can hypothesize and imagine why, but in a huge way I think that is the best part – everyone’s experience is different, and so is what they take away from it. That’s the beauty of it.

Years ago I was on a tour of an ancient Chinese town, and the tour guide was droning on about this and that building’s history, but I was not listening to a word of it. The guy next to me noticed that my head was obviously somewhere else, and asked me:

‘Don’t you want to hear the explanation of this place?’

To which I replied:

‘No. I’d rather make my own… and see it the way I want it to be.’

I think it’s the same with album art – for me, yeah it’s important. But that does not mean it is for everyone, and I think plenty of people could not have it or never see it, and still get both the experience I hope they will get, or maybe one that is even more profound. I think there is really a disturbing trend lately for people to set these kinds of ‘standards’ that just because they like things a certain way, it’s the only ‘real’ way, i.e. vinyl purists, digital haters, physical-only, etc. I will admit that I personally am old-fashioned in that I very much love to hold a release in my hands, and I think that tactile and intimate element is really important to me – it really kind of makes that CD, record, etc, a real friend I can hold when I need to – just like you need in ‘real’ life. But that does not mean it has to be important to everyone. After all, at the end of the day, music is pretty much the most abstract thing on the planet – so I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people keeping it at its ultimate conclusion of abstractness, as nothing but sound. Whatever works for you. As long as music truly means something to you, then I’m happy – whether it’s mine, or someone else’s.

What part of your music is spontaneous and what part is carefully planned? How does it related to your productivity? What kind of impulse makes you to create? What is the best time to make music?

The only part of anything I make that is carefully planned is the emotion, idea, or memory I want to express. In fact, the title of every track is written before I even sit down to make note one. I already know exactly what I want to say – but how I end up saying it is really up to my heart, and the way it ends up telling the story. So, my music manifests itself in many different ways, and I never tell it what to do.

I think this is a major reason, why I can be so productive, and always work on music, pretty much all day every day. I never get tired of it, and actually love it more with every passing day. It’s simply all I ever want to do. And I think a major component in that is the fact that I let it go where it may, so every time I sit down to make something, it’s a new adventure for me. Though I know exactly what I want to say when I sit down to say it, I have no idea how it will be said and as a result, along the way, more memories come flooding back, old and new paths reveal themselves, and I end up saying infinitely more than even I originally planned. So each time, it’s an entirely new and amazing experience. I think, if I tried to sit down and make a this or that kind of track, or force an album into some pre-determined mold of what I want it to sound like, it would basically murder my creativity in no time. I mean, how many times can you sit down to make this or that kind of track without it just becoming a pointless chore? But each time I sit down to try to say something from my heart, or put some kind of form to an emotion or memory, I am even more excited to do so than the last time. What can I say? There’s just nothing better.

It’s hard to say what kind of impulse drives me to create. Sometimes it’s something that I have been dealing with, remembering (obsessing about, more realistically), or trying to face down in my life. But just as often it’s extremely quick – something someone says, something I see, or when I simply space out for a second (which is probably more often than is healthy), a memory or emotion will trigger, and at the risk of sounding trite, it surges up from somewhere deep within, and becomes overwhelming. And at that moment, the only thing in the world that matters is translating it somehow into music – as it’s the only way I know how to say it, and the only way I know how to deal with it, or attempt to release it. It can be a hard thing to accept for those around me, because it always takes priority, and nothing can get in the way once it starts, I don’t care whose feelings I hurt in the process. All that matters is locking myself away from the world and making what I need to make. There have been times I have simply got up without saying a word and walked out of dinners, nights out with friends, my girlfriend etc, because the time had come. That’s it. I don’t feel like explaining myself, and to put it a bit horribly, I don’t care. Everything else in the world just seems pointless.

As far s the best time to create music, I’m gonna surely sound lame when I say there is no bad time. When’s the best time to eat? When you’re hungry ;)

How did you start to release in Darla Records? What changed after you started releasing in this legendary label?

Actually I had been a huge supporter of Darla for a long time, since the mid-late 90’s, as they were a local San Francisco label, and, quite frankly, I don’t think anyone in San Francisco (and later around the world) did not know who Darla was and they were one of the only labels supporting so many kinds of music, not just electronic. They were (and still are) really diverse, which is something very few independent labels – if any – can pull off.

I had actually thought of trying to send them something for quite some time, but, being my usual pessimistic self, assumed they would just think ‘Who the fuck is this idiot?’ and toss it in the trash. One day, a friend of mine, who it turned out was a mutual friend of theirs, put us in touch, and I was surprised to know that they had been fans of mine for a while, and that both of us had been thinking we should get in touch, but had not. Great minds think alike, haha.

Without going on too much of a lovey-dovey rant, the main thing that changed when I started to release on Darla was a massive source of inspiration that came from a label that size being as amazingly supportive as they are. When I first talked to James (head of Darla) on the phone before we ever did anything together, he said Darla is a family – I have never forgotten those words, and he was not kidding. He and Chandra have always just shown amazing faith and support in me, and just as importantly, trust in me that I know how my music should sound, and that I am saying what I need to say. Their kindness and all-encompassing support has really meant the world to me, and really buoyed me up through times when I could not have needed it more. I am really grateful for everything they have done for me.

As far as what changed in a non-philosophic way is the obvious factor, in that a lot more people started to know about my music from a broader spectrum, whereas previously it had pretty much been known only by more hardcore ambient or deep techno fans, especially “Serenity“, which along with “White Clouds Drift On and On” became probably my best-known work. And that could not have been more appropriate, because I think they are really the only people that would have believed in that album as much as they did, and instilled me with the complete sense of freedom it took to make it.

What, in your opinion, is the most negative phenomenon or event in the music industry and why?

You know, I would say the most negative phenomenon is negativity itself. It is everywhere, and seems to fuel nearly everything, even so many people’s so-called “love”, which they can only seem to express through hatred of everything else.

So I am not really going to talk about what I think is negative or wrong. What’s the point? I think we should all focus on what’s positive, and right – because at the end of the day, there are still a lot of great and beautiful people out there doing amazing things for all the right reasons – and I’d rather spend my time embracing and appreciating that, than talking shit about things or people I don’t like.

How does your music resonate with the world that surrounds you? Or is it completely separate world of sounds? What does more influence you – your own inner world or the real physical world? How remote your music is from reality?

For the most part it’s a completely separate world of sounds, in that I – at least consciously – don’t really take much influence from the world around me, at least in a sound way. I do actually record quite a lot of field recordings, which I often incorporate, but I think that’s more of a contextual layer to a song, to tie it to a more specific time and place, but does not really make the song ‘about’ it. Plus, I live in such a musical vacuum here in China – not only my aforementioned self-imposed one, but really one that is the result of there being pretty much no musical culture (not just electronic, but really of any kind), at least in the small city I live in. It used to be a great source of depression for me, but now I think it’s actually a great positive. It leaves my heart and mind free to do what they want, unencumbered.

I guess we can get philosophical and say anything that is your inner world is also going to contain the physical world around you, because the majority of your inner world is formed as a reaction to the world outside it, so in that sense, they are both there. I think in the past, though much of my music dealt with real-life experiences, the end result of where it took it from there was usually really far away. But in recent years, much of my music has come to reflect more and more, I guess I would say ‘real-life’ issues, and live slightly more in the now, which I think is also evidenced by the art for my albums, which has also become much more anchored in ‘real’ life, and reflects a lot of what lies behind them. In recent years, I have learned to control my music to a greater extent, to rein it in to be able to talk about much more specific memories, emotions, or events, and I think it’s become more direct as a result. So I guess in that sense, it has grown much closer to reality in recent years, I think.

I mean, every track I have ever made deals with a specific experience, memory, or emotion from my own life – so in that sense, it’s as close to reality as it gets. But in years past, I think it manifested itself in more utopian, fantasy-driven visions, whereas in recent years it’s started to take on a little more real-world context, for lack of a better term.

So basically what I’m saying I guess, in a super long-winded way, is that it’s always been directly tied to reality, but kind of expressed itself in more abstract ways before. Haha in the end, we’re trying to describe something as abstract as music, so I do not think we are going to be wholly successful, but I think you get the idea.

What are the most peaceful moments for you? How do you try to maintain/find your inner peace? Does the music helps? Does the music making helps you to feel calm and peaceful?

I’m a weird mix of someone with an immense amount of inner turmoil (and rage), and at the same time someone with a great amount of inner peace. To a large extent, this comes from some wars I had to win in the past – wars with myself, which, though they leave you the most battle-scarred, also leave you the most battle-hardened. Through those experiences, which I will not bore you with, I learned to (well, I had to) take on myself, as it attempted to turn on me – and there is no worse enemy to try to overcome than yourself, especially when it is truly seeking your destruction. While those times were torturous, I learned who I truly am – my strengths and weaknesses, and the realities of who I am and how I live my life. As a result, I learned to be much more at peace with myself, and find that peace even in turmoil.

Making music is a double-edged sword – it can help me to escape in some sense, as I’m lost in that world, but it also greatly exacerbates a lot of emotions that can be hard to face – the very ones I’m often attempting to let go of through the music itself. So it often ends up making me better and worse all at the same time. There are times, though, of such amazing elatedness that I can reach while making music, it’s really unbelievable. The whole world just falls away, and I can feel such ecstasy when I’m truly one with what’s happening, it’s a feeling that’s unlike anything else in the world.

I think it depends. Sometimes I make something to face down demons or very difficult issues or times in my life, but sometimes I also make something to celebrate a time or idea of pure beauty – and often, it’s a mix of both. So I guess it depends on the reasons I have for sitting down to make something, but either way when I’m working on music I’m truly at one with myself, which I guess is what inner peace is all about.

It’s hard to have many peaceful moments in China. It’s something I used to really have a huge problem with, but over the years, you learn to either tune things out, or just become used to living within the sphere of how things are, and just roll with it, the latter of which I’ve gotten exponentially better at in recent years, and a skill that should you lack, you’ll never be able to truly ‘live’ here. Either you go with the flow, or the flow will swallow you whole.

I find an unbelievable and true happiness from my job as a teacher. It’s no exaggeration that every day in class is real and true happiness for me (even if it’s the opposite for my poor students) – and so I’m very fortunate in that sense. But that’s happiness, and a different kind… and my only true calm and peace comes from music. It’s everything I am, and without it I would have no reason to live.

What architectural objects inspire you most in your art and in life?

I’m actually a huge architecture buff, but in a really pedestrian way, in that I don’t know anything about the technical aspects, but I spend nearly all of my time always looking at buildings, even the most minute details. The whole concept of buildings has always fascinated me on a myriad of levels, and I guess you could even say I’m quite obsessed with them. China is a pretty cool place to live if that’s the case, as you can find just about every kind of architecture here, from thousands of years ago to yesterday (even right in the city I live, which is 2500 years old, and actually before the founding of what is now China, was its own country… so 2500 years of architecture, right up to yesterday, all in one place, is pretty amazing).

Though I am interested in really every kind of architecture, it’s actually more plain, kind of run-down buildings that inspire me the most. Not for some dystopian reason, but because to me they represent true life with its wear and tear, things that at one time were so new and shining, but are now weathered, worn, and mostly forgotten or taken for granted. The people once tied to their creation either long-gone or long forgotten, but also the space within which most people spend their time that comprises this life. It’s within the most unassuming or worn buildings that the most happens. That full representation of all life, in all its stages, never ceases to inspire me. At the end of the day, we’re all the same, trying to get by, find some happiness, and attach some meaning to this life we’re forced into against our will. For me, that meaning is music. But looking at those buildings always makes me wonder what it is for the people within – what it is that makes them feel it all has meaning – if at all. It never ceases to inspire.

Do you play video games? Have you ever played them and what is your favourite genre? To what game would you like to make a soundtrack?

I’m pretty much one of the biggest video game addicts on the planet and any waking moment not spent making music is spent playing video games (yeah, I’m every woman’s dream, I know). In fact, I played semi-professionally for years, though back then it was purely for shooters, which at one point I could not take any more of because of the rampant cheating. So I went back to just playing games alone. After all, the whole point is to escape the real world, not make your supposed escape more ‘real’ and stressful than the world you are escaping.

I like a lot of genres, usually with action and survival horror topping the list, but I play a lot of different kinds, except sports games – I need a story, the deeper the better. Some of my tops of all time would be Shadow of the Colossus, the Mass Effect trilogy, the Metal Gear Solid series (especially 4), Deus Ex (Human Revolution), Dead Space, the older Resident Evils, Mirror’s Edge, and really tons more that I’ll save you droning on and on about.

But if I had to pick one top game of all time (not that you asked), it would likely be Shadow of the Colossus. That is, in my opinion, probably the best game ever made, and just deep beyond description – in fact I would not know how to describe that game if my life depended on it. I don’t think I have ever been in greater awe of a game, or had that awe more completely consume me for what seemed like eternity, long after the journey was over. It just defies every definition – or any “genre,” as it were. It is Shadow of the Colossus. And there’s nothing else in the world like it. The unbelievably intense and just monolithic emotions that game produced, in an environment that was basically complete silence, is and always will be mind-blowing.

But I gotta say, the Mass Effect trilogy is up there. Man, what an experience, and a staggering accomplishment in gaming and what it can truly do. The emotional and philosophical depth of that game on a myriad of levels, and its ability to force you to agonize through the existential dilemmas it presents, is really unparalleled. And let me go on a tangent (sorry) and say that I was one of the few, apparently, who thought the original choice of endings were the most brilliant and perfect that ever could have been. Anyone who thought otherwise had absolutely no business even playing the game, much less complaining about it. But I digress…

If I had the chance to soundtrack a game, it would likely be something in the realm of Shadow of the Colossus (though of course I would never try to do it for that actual game, it’s perfect as it is), in that it would be a pretty different, and fairly philosophic game. I have done some soundtrack work before (not for video games), and though I enjoyed it, I also found it really difficult, because it requires a lot of range, and the evocation of certain emotions that I’m personally not that great at evoking. So it would need to be a game that would allow for a lot of freedom in such areas, likely something that’s a fairly silent game to begin with. I have some friends who soundtrack games, and who have done so on some pretty famous ones, and I’m always super jealous, as it’s something I have always wanted to do, but I’m just not sure I have the game for it, no pun intended – but that’s all part of the inner peace thing – knowing what you can do and what you can’t.

More about Bvdub:
WebsiteFacebook

Secret Thirteen Interview – Mark Van Hoen

$
0
0


Photo by Nico Van Hoen

Hearing the mystery – Mark Van Hoen talks about his colorful soundworld

Mark Van Hoen is one of the mergers of two different sides of electronica – surreal, pastoral compositions and colder architectural sound experimentation. He has recorded as Mark Van Hoen, Locust and is a founding member of the band Seefeel. He has releases on R&S Records, Apollo and Editions Mego. Recent albums “The Warmth Inside You” and “The Revenant Diary” clearly reflect his ideology and technical progress. His sound is extremely hard to define as it incorporates diverse elements from different genres, including trip-hop, ambient, techno, experimental, abstract. All this makes a great trip into the world full of emotions, dreams, subconscious thoughts and just pure electronic music beauty.

In the exclusive interview Mark talks about the love for Tarkovsky and Kubrick, the impact of first listening to Stockhausen, the lack of mystery in modern times, his weird childhood dreams and of course his rich and unique sonic world. Take a glimpse behind the stage, while waiting for forthcoming Locust mix for Secret Thirteen journal.

There is an announcement about your forthcoming new album under the Locust project. It comes over the decade from the last album under this alias. How did you decide to return? Could you tell us what we should expect in it: completely new sound or more sentimental sound? Also, maybe there are some important details about it to share with our audience?

I was asked to do a set on a radio station that broadcasts to NYC, called WFMU. I asked my friend and fellow musician Louis Sherman to write and perform some new material with me for the show, and as we started to put it together, it became clear that the music we were making fitted in with the ‘Locust’ cannon of works. So we thought of resurrecting the name and using it for an album. We used a few tracks that we’d composed for the WFMU set, and some more in addition. That became ‘You’ll Be Safe Forever‘. I’d say that the record by it’s own nature is reminiscent of the Locust material in the 90′s, but hopefully there is something new to offer, too.

What is more important to you in sound – abstraction, melody or rhythm? What do you think relates them? What are their roles in creating atmosphere, mood? Do you more rely on melodies, rhythms or abstractions? What places do they occupy in your music?

I think they are all interrelated and at best interchangeable. The whole concept of electronic music (at least for me) was that timbre itself could be as expressive as the conventions of rhythm, melody & harmony. I’ve always found it hard to accept the fact that the majority define the term electronic music not as an indication to expect something new sonically, but quite the opposite. To use a random but very common example – something that must feature a Roland TR909 drum machine in order to be valid within a certain genre of ‘electronic music’

Brian Eno once said “I always use the same guitar; I got this guitar years and years ago for nine pounds. It’s still got the same strings on it”. What is your musical equipment and do you often change it? Maybe you have some main synthesizer or live instrument without which you could not do? Being in the scene so many years, could you share your thoughts about hardware and software differences, advantages and disadvantages, also about your own methods of creating?

I never knew that about Eno’s guitar. I always though that he was an advocate for the past being something he did not care to revisit (which I believe is to the detriment of his music). I don’t really have a specific instrument that I am attached to, but I am a great believer in a massive and fundamental difference between hardware and software. The problem with software is that it’s so easy to conform to a genre (and very authentically). This means that people are making mistakes less and less, and therefore not being creative. I also think that there is something unmusical about making music while looking at a screen. I’m not necessarily against making music with a with a computer (or micro-processor based device) but the fact that virtually all music these days is made with our eyes and not our ears.

Nowadays we see emerging concept of hauntology in electronic music scene. The music of such artists as The Caretaker or Belbury Poly is haunted by past, evokes hidden memories, forgotten sounds, lost time, even some subconscious reminiscences. What memories, past, subconsciousness mean to your music and life? How do you see it from psychoanalytical, post modern or other perspectives? Is it a form of inspiration?

Yes, but perhaps not so deliberate and knowingly as the artists you mention. I don’t come at it in quite the same way. The likes of The Caretaker and Demdike Stare willfully reference to musics of the past in order to improve upon them, making a more consistent experience. I find it hard to to, but it’s an admirable skill. I don’t perform any analysis on the way memory informs my music. It’s an inevitable part of making music, whether you are young or old, and whatever life experience you may have, and it’s also intrinsic to the inspiration of music making.

Post modernism is a king of rewriting of the past. What do you think of this concept from the nowadays perspective? What do you think about the future? Are there some revolutions coming or we will rely on the rewriting and reinterpreting of the past?

Yes, I think it’s basically over from a revolutionary point of view, I’m sorry to say, but again that’s down to technology overwhelming any secretive and natural growth of any new development in style of music. But I do think that there can be minor revolutions. The problem is that most young people are satisfied – or even aspire to – referencing the past and conforming in some way. There seems to be no shame in that for most. The currency of the new is not a very strong one it seems. I also would say that the concept of post-modernism is lost on most. It’s ideals have become endemic in the way music and art is made.

At the moment you are living in Brooklyn. Could you share your thoughts on the tendencies of alternative music in your city.

There is a good deal of electronic music being made in Brooklyn, it’s a hard and urban environment, and I think that it’s exactly that kind of situation that creates the backdrop for that kind of music. It’s difficult to imagine electronic music being rural or even sub-urban, I know there are a few examples, but for me not many successful ones.

What does always makes you feel nostalgic? What do you miss in modern world in general? Maybe something makes you feel anxious or, on the contrary, happy?

I don’t think there is any particular event or trigger that always makes me nostalgic, it’s just random and incidental. The triggers for nostalgia increase as we get older of course, but I think it’s a natural thing to long for certain aspects of the past for people of all ages. I’ve even noticed my children doing it from time to time. That’s comforting in a way, that it’s simply part of the human condition, to long for the familiar. The biggest thing I miss in contemporary times is mystery. The time when I had to find out about something by going to the library, or asking a friend, or traveling somewhere. Not simply typing it into Google. So much is over exposed and lacking in magic, potency and mystery. It makes me feel anxious to wonder if anyone post internet-age can ever really experience anything culturally with the same depth that was possible last century.

What are your landmarks in music history? What are the defining moments for you, that influenced, inspired you? What are the landmarks in your personal music history?

I would say most of the inspirational landmarks for me would have been when I was 12/13 years old in 1979. I think that many others are defined at about this age, too. This has something to do with the transition into adulthood, and being the first time when a person can be very affected by music & art. For me personally this was being played Karlheinz Stockhausen’s ‘Kontakte’ in my music class at school, and at the same time hearing UK electronic music like Brian Eno, The Human League, OMD, Gary Numan & Cabaret Voltaire as well as German groups like Kraftwerk and Tangerine Dream. For my own music history, I suppose that getting a recording and publishing contract was a milestone, because I could then make music my main occupation, I could really immerse myself into it. After that, my decision to switch from analogue to digital instruments in 1995 was a big turning point, and that is evident in the music.

Are you interested in cinema? What kind of cinema occupies the most part of your life? Maybe you have your favourite movies, directors? Could you name some best movies you have recently seen? Could you elaborate on what particular things inspire you in cinema? Maybe it is the lifelikeness of the scenes, unexpected denouements or maybe special effects, philosophical dialogues, aesthetic in general?

I am very interested in cinema, and in fact when I was younger, I would see at least one film a week at the cinema. In the fullness of time, I would have to say that Kubrick & Tarkovsky are my favorite directors. There is such depth and wealth of quality in their films, on a number of levels. You asked what particularly inspires, but I would say that directors like these are able to operate utilizing all of the aspects you mention, and more. That’s what makes them great.

Do you experience insomnia? What do you think at that moment, maybe you had some strange thoughts that caused it?

I don’t really experience insomnia, but I do have very vivid and disturbing dreams frequently. The one clear example is one dream I have had since childhood. A female, witch-like character shows me a house that has no walls. In one of the rooms is a boy that has been cooked in an oven, and is lying on a bed. She shows me the boy, and asks if I would also like to be cooked, and tries to persuade me in a very passive way, that it would be a good thing for me. In the dream I want to be outraged and repulsed, but in reality it is all very calm and matter-of-fact. I’ve never understood what it means. I wonder if it might be an future prediction that when I die, it might be from a fire. I think they are caused by anxiety in general, but I think we all have that to some degree.

Would you agree to modify your body and install some devices in it for improving your life (e.g. expand your memory)? Would you like to prolong your life, make it more convenient by using such measures?

I would not rule it out, but I would have to know the specifics of course. I think some kind of organic or genetic modification could be possible, but I don’t think I could ever consider having any electronic or mechanical enhancement.

What is the most memorable event in your career?

The first time a stranger told me that they bought my record. I think it was my first EP ‘Skysplit’. I don’t play my own music myself, but do occasionally have cause to listen back again. For example, last week a man from Holland requested some original versions of early vinyl-only releases of mine. He was very specific about what he wanted. A definitive digital copy of all of the tracks from 3 vinyl releases from my own personal DAT mixdowns of those tracks. It was interesting to go through the old tapes, and I discovered a few things that I’d forgotten about, a few mixes of old tracks that were very different to the released versions. Another was hearing John Peel play my music on the radio. It’s always great to know that people listen, and I always feel humbled to hear when someone likes my music for no other reason than….they do!

More about Mark Van Hoen:
WebsiteTwitterDiscogs

Secret Thirteen Interview – Dalglish

$
0
0


The world behind the beautiful algorithms – Dalglish, unsung hero of IDM, speaks

Chris Douglas hiding behind Dalglish, O.S.T., Scald Rougish and several other aliases is an unsung hero of electronic/IDM/experimental scene, for about 20 years creating complex mathematical sound constructions charged with emotion and full of wide sonic spaces. Having released albums “OtJohr” and “Benacah Drann Deachd” on Highpoint Lowlife and Record Label Records, he puts you in an entirely separate world full of unpredictable algorithms, twists, mood swings and, of course, subtle beauty. Having a rich back catalogue, Dalglish explored various corners and spaces of electronic music, thus experimenting with different combinations of sound. You can experience it while listening to his excellent Secret Thirteen mix.

In this exclusive interview Dalglish talks about various different aspects of nowadays scene and his own recordings, troubling influence of amateurishness, relations between time and sound, dreams, life contradictions and their direct influence to music.

Feel free to visit Dalglish website www.amhain.net for more.

What does time mean to you in music? Apart from the duration of tracks does time exist in music? Do you repeat and transform sounds from the past in your music or do you create future sounds?

Time gets lost in everything doesn’t it? I find that comforting. If something comes out spontaneously, and then when you listen to it, you can be absorbed in a time removed from present time. I do borrow from my older compositions and bring them into newer ones sometimes. So, I suppose it is a mixture of past, present and future.

How does your every day life, daily events influence your sound? How is your sound connected with your emotions? Or maybe your music exist in an entirely separate space detached from every day life, human emotions?

My work is a reaction to all the unfiltered things I experience inside and outside. I have great difficulty to filter all things around me, so, of course, human emotion is an integral part of the work. Life is contradictory; it’s simple, complex, chaotic pleasure. There is no separation between my life and my work.

Your new album “Bytreqw” on Icasea has been just released. Could you tell us what mood you were trying to develop and what is the message encoded behind all these complex layers? How different this work is from your another creations by looking at it from technological and experimentation perspective?

With this one and all my other works, beyond the personal aspects of it all, I try to display what is possible and where things should be by
 now; everything has to evolve. I find it disgusting and sad what has happened to Electronic music in last ten years, and especially Techno. Never thought it would become dominated by such bland ideas.

As mentioned before, I find this is the artist’s job to do so – to evolve – otherwise you are the equivalency of a tribute band. Something that originated with such innovation seems to have gotten completely
 stagnant, too comfortable. Without this sincerity and evolution, we will 
become stuck in a never-ending loop of mediocrity where all is accepted, no one caring or questioning anything, and the work will be no different, just a repackaging of faked rebellion and simulated diversity that is already shaping today’s so-called subcultures.

Aphex Twin once said that he dreams some of his music. Your sound sometimes has this dreamlike, even surreal mood. Are you influenced by your dreams? Have you ever dreamed of a track?

Again, there’s no real separation. Sometimes dreams seem more realistic than waking life. There are always noises in the background of my dreams, and they’re probably mine. I’m not necessarily making music in dreams, but there’s a lot of background sounds in them, and I’ve tried emulating them before.

There were many narratives in history related with vastness of the sky (e.g. in Hindu Brahma is born from egg, floating in the global ocean). What process of the universe (or maybe astronomical object) inspires you most and why? Are you interested in astronomy, physics or math, in general? Your architectural and transdimensional music makes me think, that you have your opinion on all those subjects.

I have a great interest in all these things, of course. I don’t like talking about specific references. Using direct references feels a bit desperate and meaningless these ‘parasitic” days. I think there’s no separation between those subjects and music.

I find that constantly questioning, searching and endlessly experimenting is essential and should be instinctual. Through my personal studies, I’ve found a lot of inspiration in people who have used these influences inter-connectedly.

Nowadays, when almost everyone has the ability to make music, there tends to be more and more projects and genres. Are you afraid of it and is there any threat to music due to this? Could you mention some interesting new artists in the scene? What is so special about them? Or maybe you miss responsibility and sincere contribution to music? Elaborate on this.

I was reading an article the other day online comparing an artist who has just had their first release compared to a revolutionary computer music pioneer working in the 70s. Essentially, this new artist proclaimed using a laptop as an “underused” instrument. This left me confused, and slightly scared.  I think it is a problem that anyone can do it now. I do miss a sense of responsibility and labour in music. Historically, this is nothing new, of course; when any genre reaches a certain level of popularity, sincerity can appear to become lost. This is obvious in mainstream music, but seems now to be reaching the more experimental/Electronic scene. We are forcefed a lot of shit, everywhere – especially in music — and I’m amazed that people aren’t angrier about this. People should demand more. That’s the responsibility of the listeners, the journalists, and the artists.

Most major composers created music by using various self built systems (e.g. Arnold Schoenberg created his twelve tone technique – dodecaphony). Do you have your own creative system and what do you think about systems in music in general? Is this a restriction or a way to perfection?

I think that a lot of classically trained people have a lot of restriction on their “individual” creativity, but I do appreciate when they can break away from their training to incorporate more personal expressions. I think the mind cries out for unpredictability. We need to be more entertained, surprised, and emotionally enveloped by works. When it comes to my own work, it’s more of a spontaneous documentation, which may or may not be edited afterwards. Perfection is never attainable — it should always be challenged. If by some chance, you reach perfection, life is over, or at least rather boring. No?

Recently the oldest (2500 BC) string instruments The Lyres of Ur were found. They were treated as heavenly invention back then. What do you think are the most interesting technological achievements in music nowadays? Is there anything still to be invented in music regarding instruments, sound, technology? What do you think is the future of intelligent music?

The ‘under used’ laptop, MAX/MSP, FM Synthesis, Modular synths, Kosmische/New Age Music and other catch all cliches. of course… Arse!!

But, seriously, I think a lot of technological advances by software and hardware companies have homogenized sound, mimicking what we used to have to discover for ourselves by experimenting with tape, synthesizers, pedals and other hardware. This is not a bad thing for people who already know how to use these tools, of course, but i feel that a lot of things that used to take more effort to achieve in the past can now be arrived at with simple presets. With this recent regurgitation of the ‘darker elements’ of music, it is hard to detect what is authentic anymore. If anything. People should demand more effort, honesty, more vulnerability and true risk and respect for history. It is dangerous when ignorance and egotism rule with no respect or need for experience.

So, you ask me what is the future of intelligent music?
I’m not really sure what you mean…

Dalglish ‘Venoyn’ EP soon to be released on Record Label Records.

More about Dalglish:
WebsiteFacebookSoundcloudBandcamp

Secret Thirteen Interview – Adam Fowler

$
0
0


An unpredictable universe of deliberate complexity and abyssal emotion – Adam Fowler, influential visual artist

Adam Fowler (b. 1979) is a visual artist who lives and works in Brooklyn, NY. Fowler studied at Maryland Institute College of Art and Bachelor of Fine Arts, Baltimore, MD. After his first solo exhibition in 2005, Fawler has been very active in the world of art for over the decade. Fowler’s drawings have been featured in Horror Vacui at McKenzie Fine Art and The New Collage at Pavel Zoubok Gallery; as well as at Weatherspoon Art Museum in Greensboro, NC; and Vincent Price Art Museum in Los Angeles, CA.

Working with paper, Fowler produces complex geometry, intently constructed sculptural compositions that transform into three dimensional rigid constructions. Fowler uses an X-Acto knife to cut precisely all the negative space from each piece, creating a refined paper lace of graphite lines. By looping these lines he transforms them into organic drawings. Fawler’s works could be described as “sculptural drawing” that shows subtle intricacy and graceful depth.

In this exclusive interview Adam Fowler shares his insights about art and its management, reveals some of his influences and talks about his future plans.

Please tell us something interesting about how you became the kind of artist you are today. What were the biggest challenges?

First let me thank you for taking the time to interview me. I’ve always felt that being an artist is a slow evolution, that we constantly refine our thinking and processes. I had always been interested in drawing as it is one of the most direct and immediate forms of expression. I started drawing with gestural lines while I was in college and have been refining my process while keeping to the original idea of gesture. I was making these drawings with line after line, they were getting denser and darker and over time I got to the point where I couldn’t go any further. Around the time I started to feel frustration in my work I came across an artist’s work that was cut paper and brought that process to my work. Making the layers of gestural lines more delineated gave me a tremendous amount of freedom and the work has been developing ever since. My work is a culmination of very fast gestural or automatic line drawings in graphite, the removal of the negative space in the line drawings and then layering. The work ranges anywhere from two layers to as many as eighty-eight layers.

One of the biggest challenges in my work is keeping it fresh, while I think it’s extremely important to focus deeply on something over a long period of time it can also be challenging to keep it interesting and relevant.

Your work seems to occupy some space between drawing and sculpture. How would you describe them to the individual who sees your work for the first time?

I’m very interested in the idea that my drawings can be seen as sculpture and vice-versa. It’s human to want to categorize ourselves but often to the detriment of artwork, so I feel like I’m succeeding somehow when my work doesn’t exactly fit in one place.

At first sight, we strongly feel chaotic feelings in your work. Are these organic lines formed accurately or accidentally? Does chaos somehow influence your work?

I usually think of my work as gestural and what I think you are referring to as chaotic I see completely differently. What I have been thinking about lately is the idea of duality in my work, particularly duality of process, which can at times feel overwhelming, but I think in person they lean toward meditative.

How important is the collaboration between artist and gallery?

The relationship that artists have with their galleries is incredibly important. There needs to be support from both artist and gallery and an open dialogue. When they have an honest respect and trust for each other, both do well. I think that collaboration may be the wrong word because the artist should have complete conceptual and aesthetic control of their work but at the same time we as artists need to understand that galleries need to sell work to stay open.

What are the past or contemporary painters who influence or excite you?

I’m interested in Abstract Expressionism and Minimalism although they are theoretically at odds with each other, but what is more important to me is what’s happening now in the art world. If I had to narrow it down to three individual artists it would be Donald Judd, Brice Marden and Jackson Pollock but partly because I can look at an entire career’s worth of work.

How are you and your works related to music? What importance has music in your life? Do you have your favorite musicians or specific musical genre you are constantly listening to?

I love music but I don’t listen to one specific genre. I recently had the opportunity to get to know Richard Chartier through a project and have been introduced to a whole new world of music and I am very grateful for that.

In what other activities apart from art are you interested? What is so special about these activities? Could you elaborate on this question.

I’ve been increasingly interested in modern design, specifically from Scandinavia. I live in New York and one of my favorite things to do is make the rounds of high end galleries/stores that focus on vintage modern furniture. One of my favorite designers is Hans Wegner who spent his career refining the chair and what it meant to sit. Another Scandinavian designer who has become important to me is Jens Quistgaard who primarily focused his attention to tableware and kitchenware.

What are you working on now? When and where could we expect to see your new works?

I just finished work for a solo exhibition I’ll be having with Margaret Thatcher Projects in New York that opens in late March (2013), the show is titled “Escaping Forward” and consists of two separate series of drawings and one large scale installation. The installation will be the first of its kind for me and will be 10 feet long by 3 feet high; it will be made out of 41 individual sheets of paper.

(2012). Untitled, 14 x 11. graphite on paper, hand cut.

(2012). Untitled, 22 x 15. graphite on paper, hand cut.

(2012). Untitled, 14 x 11. graphite on paper, hand cut.

(2013). Untitled, 22 x 15. graphite on paper, hand cut.

(2013). Untitled, 22 x 15. graphite on paper, hand cut.

More about Adam Fowler:
Website

Secret Thirteen Interview – Lebanon Hanover

$
0
0


Photo by Larissa Iceglass

In search of real feeling – heartfelt and smart interview with Larissa Iceglass, one half of the modern age romantics Lebanon Hanover

Once there were two poetic souls wandering around Europe. Eventually they met each other and put their longing for love and true feeling in sounds. Thus, they formed Lebanon Hanover, an ice cold reply to the alienated world coming from two warm beating hearts. The duo of Larissa Iceglass and William Maybelline appear as true romantics of the modern age, admiring William Wordsworth, fascinated by the beauty of art nouveau aesthetics, exploring British seashores and forests at night as well as inspired by the urbanism of Berlin. They expressed those unique senses in albums “Why Not Just Be Solo?” and “The World Is Getting Colder“, released on Fabrika Records label. Their sound share many sensibilities with the fragility and elegance of French cold wave, the most subtle elements of goth rock, minimal wave aesthetics. A perfect combination to express the poetry of emotionalism, detachment, longing, love, melancholy…

In this exclusive interview Larissa, the feminine part of the duo, allowed us to take a glimpse to very personal, but geographically vast world of Lebanon Hanover, stretching from Switzerland to Berlin to North England and Scotland coasts to Ruhr Area Germany. It is a great addition to their glassy, refined and beautiful music.

You are from quite different places – Berlin and England. How does this fact influence you? How does those cities contribute culturally to your art? How this geographical dualism affects you?

We were both born in a place we didn’t particularly like. I am from Switzerland actually. The cultural difference is pretty big between the sterile swiss and the rundown rather primitive northern British lifestyle. It really shapes our music that we are constantly searching for a comfortable exciting and creative place. We actually still haven’t really found a home. Berlin was inspiring but after three years too humdrum and cold. Currently we are having a taste of the Ruhr Area in Germany and are pretty happy there.

Lebanon Hanover is duet. However, we can see the difference in mood and style between songs performed by different member. How each of you approach the project? What are your roles? How do you approach with the same idea, concept? Is it difficult to make a compromise? Was it difficult to start working with each other?

I think we are two very different musical elements. This was our great fascination with each other from the start on and it was never difficult to work with each other. More like an instant chemistry. I adore Williams baselines, rhythms and structures and he likes my chaotic strange sounding haunting voice, lyrics and guitars. There is no concept or something like this. All we wanted was to sound underproduced and nostalgic, because we were irritated by the digital and inorganic sounds we hear everyday. Since we are thinking very similar there is hardly any compromise, only criticism which is good and helps the final product. Sometimes we work up to two months on a song until we are both completely happy with it.

Photo by Elias Raschle

Your music is quite cold, introvert, sounding as response to the alienated world, that lacks love and true feelings. How do you see the modern world in this context? Do you think we face lack of emotions? What kind of message, feeling do you try to convey? And, just to put it simply, do you believe in true love and its power to change the world?

Times are hard for romantics in this century. The world wants us to survive alone, do everything yourself and treat people like you don’t need them. We find this terribly sad for we have a very big longing for bond and true friendships. I think people have become generally way too lazy to even reflect about the separation that is happening at the moment. The internet and smart phones have even made us more lazy and the real passions of life, art, nature, literature and love is just non existent. True love is something we really hope survives, but it can only survive when people become more individualistic and self-determined. It’s the individuals that make society and I believe that every single one can make a change…

What is the primary impulse that makes you create music? What role Lebanon Hanover and music in general plays in your life? Do you see it as self expression, necessity, pleasure, sublimation, entertainment etc.?

The moment of creating a song. I absolutely live for the moment you take the microphone connect with your subconscious and sacrifice yourself to your inner melodies and put all of your heart in a track. Music is the most honest form of art for me and therefore Lebanon Hanover is the very centre of our both lives. It’s not just a side project or something it’s our vocation and we could die for it. We do it merely for ourselves. To entertain was not the most favorable thing to do at the start, but I have to say that to be face to face with an audience and fill the silence of the room with the your own words and sounds is a very touching and always an exciting experience.

Photo by Isolde Woudstra

What do you find beautiful and most aesthetically inspiring? Is it some places, certain kind of music, other art forms? Where do you find most beauty in?

Aesthetically we are drawn to the romantic/art nouveau and 20′s and 80′s period of the last century. Old framed black and white photos, movies, clothes. We love the well-mannered androgynous look and to be dressed in gloominess.

I think it’s important that our image reflects the depression of the 21st century we all have to go through. Our favorite art form is literature. I am too sensitive for movies. Too many effects and sexual brutality scare me so we mainly spend our spare time reading and imagining the words becoming pictures. Some name dropping of things we read at the moment: Oscar Wilde,Thomas Bernhard, Alice Schwarzer, William Wordsworth. Of course, music is always inspiring too if a band has deepness and honesty like for example Malaria, Kraftwerk, Daf, The Smiths. I can be very fond of them, but I don’t listen to much music at the moment.

As far as we know you live in Sutherland in England? Why did you move here? It is a rural town. How does the nature and environment affect you?

It’s a tragic place actually. We mainly moved there to live for free at Williams parents’ to be able to write music and explore the forests and the sea during the night. It was disheartening when we were completely isolated and shut of from the beautiful people we would have liked to be with. Only for the sake of our art we moved there. Though it was a very productive time and we were able to write music and lyrics every day, which counts in the end if it’s all you live for. But I am very glad we finally escaped to Germany.

Your T-Shirt says “Lose Your Digital Life”? What do you mean by that? What do you think is the influence of digital media, technology, IT to the world? How it changed the world and our lives?

Lose your digital life is a line from a new Lebanon Hanover song. It is an encouraging command from a hopeless nostalgic to bring people together in real life, but I am too unfortunately too dependent on the internet and it is sadly very impossible to lose it. The internet is a very informative and great tool to learn, but most people use it for distraction or cruelty. I am afraid of the future and not sure if it really connects humans, because after all we are not ‘together’ if everyone is on their own smartphone on a party. The critical minds, I guess, there is not just enough of them.

7” on Berlin label [aufnahme+wiedergabe] have been released on the 28th of February. It will be released as a second edition on the 9th of May. The new LP is planned for September 2013.

More about Lebanon Hanover:
FacebookSoundcloud


Secret Thirteen Interview – Haus Arafna

$
0
0


Photo by Alice Angeletti

Shaping the vague life concrete – an interview with angst pop architects Haus Arafna

The German angst pop/industrial innovators Haus Arafna seemed to be standing on the edge of two worlds. Employing the harshness and roughness of industrial/noise sonic pallette and more subtle sounds of post punk/minimal wave, they created their own world of refined extremity. This allows their music to be charged with different emotions. Their cold and monolith compositions sometime sting like needles, while in other cases show the path to their unique sonic world, where anger stands next to melancholy and poeticism. This creates an intense, artistic soundworld with strong atmosphere and impressive narratives. All this is documented in such unique and distinct releases as “Butterfly”, “You”, “New York Rhapsody” all of them released on their own Galakthorrö label.

In this exclusive interview the duo talks about the failures of mankind, the simplicity of black color, creative impulses and other issues behind and within their music.

Your music sometimes sounds like an angry explosion of negative emotions (anger, aggression, depression, cold harsh electronic sounds). Do you find a kind of aesthetics in it or does your music not supposed to be beautiful? What do you think is the role of those emotions in art/life? Is there some light in your music as well?

It’s important to know for this kind of questions from which musical background we come from. We grew up on post punk/wave/industrial, so this kind of music isn’t negative at all for our taste. It’s just ‘normal’ for us, nevertheless, this kind of music is negative in all objectivity, of course.

The positive effect of aggressive or sad music is, that you are able to reduce aggression or sadness through it. Our listeners are usually nice and handsome guys, since their negative thoughts and emotions were converted in positive energy by the cathartic impact of our music.

In one interview you said about music “Art is in the eye of the beholder, but we think music should be more than entertainment”. Could you tell us what kind of energy and meaning a track should transfer? Could a piece of music change listener’s way of life? Maybe you could provide specific examples.

Many things are possible with music and everything, even details can change someone’s life. We don’t even have the power over it.

What role does your art do to you? Is it a type of therapy for cleaning yourself by expressing emotions? What part of your personality do you try to channel? What impact are you trying to create for the listener? What is your intended relation to him/her?

We use to work up different things, get energy and strength from making music or writing lyrics. It makes us to suffuse with happiness, especially when a new promising piece of sound or music comes to us. Over time that good feeling has become essential for us. Yes, it’s a kind of therapy today. In earlier times it was a more intellectual and distant approach, but at the same time more superficial.

It’s impossible for us to foresee the effect on the listener. Everybody feels and listens different. We don’t intend to create a special impact to the listener, anything ‘produced’ or ‘planned’ as much, but we create more intuitive and just for ourselves or for the song itself, which always has its own life actually.

What are your primary emotional impulses for your art? What things inspire you and pushes to create? What kind of emotions?

The fail of mankind, being trapped in the body and being unredeemed.

Some of your music might be defined as angst pop. That is quite a strange term. How do you understand it and what would be its description? Angst and pop seems to be quite an interesting contradiction. How do you see it? Pop part is especially interesting here.

Aesthetically we are drawn to the romantic/art nouveau and 20′s and 80′s period of the last century. Old framed black and white photos, movies, clothes. We love the well-mannered androgynous look and to be dressed in gloominess.

The term ‘angst pop’ was brought up by SPK. You can hear that in their song “Walking On Dead Steps”. Angst Pop was a free idea, which stood in contrast to the common term ‘industrial’. We think, in the consideration of old interviews, SPK wanted to distance themselves from the term ‘industrial’. ‘Industrial’ was occupied in that time, even more than today by Throbbing Gristle. SPK wanted probably to edge their own profile.

We incorporated ‘Angst Pop’, because of a similar reason: we want a distance from the term ‘industrial’ not because we need to distance ourselves from Throbbing Gristle, but from the today falsely often used term ‘industrial’, for example guitar rock music or techno. ‘Angst pop’ means for us to cultivate the free form of ‘industrial’, which we force into our three pillars system: sex, emotions and movement on which our music is built on.

What is your opinion about nowadays industrial music scene from the global perspective of events, releases, information spread? Is it still developing? Or maybe do you think that scene and the music it represents is in decline? Maybe you think that there is lack of certain things relevant to its development, such as promoters or writers? What were the key turning points in the scene during the last decade? Also you release your records in your own Galakthorrö label. What are the reasons for that?

The reason for our own label is the fact, that we just made it and didn’t think about making it different. We were young.

For us it’s hard to talk about the scene, since we seldom go out for a night, but we realise a strong interest for Galakthorrö, even in today’s times, where it seems you can get everything for free. Perhaps it could be a squint for a lively industrial scene? We know about some little scenes which are local, e.g. in the USA and Scandinavia in which we are residing, too. Certainly that’s wide-ranging and every scene which could form under the term ‚industrial’ divide itself into pieces – like in other genres too.

Your music sometimes might sound nihilistic, misanthropic. Do you share those worldviews? What place do they occupy in your own perception of world? Do you believe in mankind, its future? Do you look optimistic to our current status and future perspectives?

Our worldview is rather pessimistic. The human kind has to face problems and we can’t imagine, that people are smart enough to solve such kind of complex global issues. Maybe it’s beyond the potential of human nature. We often think, mankind has done so many sins against the nature, that humans literally earned to become punished in the future. It’s a sad affair that innocents (e.g. the animals) would suffer again respectively furthermore. With regard to history we think mankind is much more nihilistic than Haus Arafna.

Quite an abstract question, what are the most beautiful things in life for you? What do you find the most aesthetically pleasant, attractive?

As Haus Arafna we search for the aesthetic in artifacts, departure and haziness. Life is vague and we try to shape it concrete. But aesthetic has many facets. It’s not that cats or synthesisers aren’t beautiful.

Black color had its distinct meaning throughout history. For the ancient Egyptians, black had very positive associations (it was the color of Anubis), but for the ancient Greeks it was evil color that associated with Hades, also black was one of the first colors used in art. Your image is quite full of black color. What does it mean for you? Does it associate with specific events, objects, stories? What is your ideology about black color and its role in the present times? Where do you think lies the beauty of black color?

The black colour is a self-imposed limitation we use to reduce design to the essential. As a nice side effect it’s an exception nowadays and take ourselves off others. One colour symbolises for us the focusing, to simplifying, to reducing the complex world full of redundant information. The main problem for people in the post industrial society is to filter, sort, equalise and quit information.

In this regard all that black symbolises a “black box”, which records the mistakes in this process.

Your band titles is the name of building with rich and dark history behind. David Lynch in one interview said that buildings are also recording devices. What do you think of this idea? Do you think that buildings record moods, energy, events and can recreate it somehow? What do you think about energy in such buildings and what do they have? Do you believe in ghosts?

That’s not the reason why we had chosen the name Haus Arafna and we don’t know, if something like ghosts or energy in buildings exist. Sometimes we have such a feeling, but everybody sense that different, we think.

Religious topics in your music provides different people with various diverse thoughts. Some statements about such and some other topics could shock more conservative man. How do your closest relatives react to your music? What are your own insights about metaphysics and the Creator? In what do you believe? Or maybe you think that religion was only an obstruct for the intellectual evolution of mankind?

Our relatives have no close view in our work. They understand it as a style of music. No one gives a thought about it.

People are inclined to build a religion, if not collective, then everybody for himself. Also our music has an independent existence in that sense. We can’t fully control it – maybe it’s directed by the Creator.

How do you understand depression? Did it influence the sound and ideology of your music? How, in your opinion, musicians understand depression and how do they use it for creating something? Or maybe you think that there is another feeling, much stronger than depression, that allows us to act and at the same time expresses the effect of absorbing the environment?

If you want to work with depression you need to have a depression and when you have a depression you can’t work. Unless you have this typical change of manic and depressive episodes, but also then you’ll be inspired more by the mania because you are able to work during the manic episode only.

We as more or less healthy persons work with emotional projections. That means, that a small feeling become talked up with creativity and fantasy and set up in a context, which has a preferably general claim, so that it can have validity for many persons.

How are you related with other forms of art? Do you attend art exhibitions? From the sociological perspective, the majority of people would not suspect, that you could be influenced by impressionism, romanticism, minimalism, but maybe they are wrong? Could you share with us your thoughts about visual arts and favourite artists.

We’re not influenced by art, not consciously influenced at least. We’re influenced by the technical devices we have and by the bounds of this equipment as well as by the budget and factual constraints.

In the 90s we were influenced by design and typography instead of art. Over time we developed a graphic language out of it, which we often just have to operate respectively to modify.

We thought of integration in any case from the beginning, that means handling visuals and sounds in equal value. We realised early, that the artist of the future has to work in multimedia way.

It seems that you are quite into books and serious cinema. Could you tell us about your latest literary and visual discoveries and why they made such a big impression, emotional impact or maybe disappointment.

We’re not very skilled about film and cinema.

A movie, which we saw not long ago and which kept us in our minds was Tom Ford’s “A Single Man”.

The last time we read classics of literature was at last “Green Henry” by Gottfried Keller. It was written just splendid, but substantial fairly flat, except some journeys of philosophic nature about the reflection and impact of art.

Very disappointing was the novel “Blindness” by José Saramago. It was the worst book we ever read and the Nobel Prize for Literature for this book is just absurd in our view.

We were impressed by Dostojewski’s “The Brothers Karamazov”, especially by the diary of ‘Staretz Sossima’ and the ‘Grand Inquisitor’, the little books in the book, so to say.

More about Haus Arafna:
Website

Secret Thirteen Interview – KORB

$
0
0


Photo by Lyja

Constructing unearthly narratives that convince with truthfulness – an interview with an influential visual art composer KORB

Rimantas Lukavičius is a director and founder of digital filmmaking and design company KORB, based in Vilnius, Lithuania. Having started to work on diverse motion designs while studying architecture and photo/media in 2007, Lukavičius has progressively established itself in the arts world. By working with such well-known brands as MTV, Formula 1, Discovery USA (SCI Channel) and other notable companies KORB drew a subtle balance line between art and commerce. Rimantas and his productive team works were recognized in such worldwide festivals as Resfest, Onedotzero, Semi-Permanent, KTR Festival. Circuito Off festival even awarded KORB with special prize – screening at Centre Pompidou in Paris (2013).

The unexpected and subtly aesthetic scenes created by KORB require your imagination, empathy and receptivity. This is where organic inspirations meet supernatural world, thus leading observer into the fictional sphere of visionary happenings. Focusing on aesthetic, imaginative consistency and technical perfection delivers incredible narratives and implement impressive ideas in the work. High-quality works, innovation, originality and suggestibility are landmarks to KORB brand developing ideology and constantly growing creative identity. Their website declares “KORB explores the physical and mathematical nature of unusual forms, substances and materials, which reveals the particular field of photorealism in the industry – photosurrealism”. This is the obvious truth. With over 1 million unique views on Vimeo KORB continues to investigate and reshape multi-platform world and amaze every spectator of the surreal digital reality.

Secret Thirteen invites you to know more about KORB phenomenon by reading this smart and informative interview with Rimantas Lukavičius.

How would you describe your works in terms of style, enduring value and ideology behind them?

Basically, I think that our works don’t fit into one concise category of style or ideology, but I’d probably focus on minimalism as a main and most crucial point in my works. Minimalism focuses on shapes, textures, reflections. The same you can feel in our works.

Another fundamental starting point is imperative of aesthetics. Or we can simply call it beauty, even attractiveness. Our team design addicts, art lovers, fashion and architecture trend hunters. On the other hand we are driven by passion for technology, we are obsessed by mathematical precision and programming subtleties as well as physics and chemistry. The most enjoyable is the process of combining all these passions to achieve aesthetical and technical perfection.

Anyway, I feel that our latest visual experiments with digital sculptures lead us behind the boundaries of photorealism, closer toward photosurrealistics.

Can you tell us a bit more about your collaboration with MTV, Formula 1, Discovery? What were the positive and the negative aspects of working with these brands?

MTV was the first big commercial project for Korb. And probably the best project could ever be for the starting VFX company. We had an absolute creative freedom. And very big creative support from MTV creative director John Kwoka. The project was really huge for such a small team, enough challenging from technical side and the deadline was pretty tight. But we really did the best we could, and a little bit more to be honest. It worked: MTVHD Lake won Gold in animation category at KTR Festival, Idents were featured by most influential online magazines and blogs, I won a prestigious ADC Young Guns award.

Formula 1 allowed us to learn from inside how the world of advertising works. We collaborated with London based advertising agency DixonBaxi. TV Idents for Science was another amazing project with our great friends from London based Design and Motion studio ManvsMachine.

As to negative aspects, I actually don’t think that working for world known brand is much different than for any other client. The main challenge and aspiration is to enjoy the process and achieve the final result, that satisfies not only the client, but you and your team as well.

It is common for people working in creative industries to have many projects at a time? How important is the flexibility when you are working on a number of projects?

We are lucky enough not to rush among big amount of projects going on at the same time. Our team is quite small – four people and a few freelancers we usually collaborate with. Actually, we can’t work on more than one or two big, challenging projects at once.

Sometimes we have to turn down good and very interesting projects and it never is an enjoyable process. But we believe that those with whom we work appreciate and understand the fact that we’ll focus on project 100 percent. So, actually, every project, which we produce, every story we tell is a preferential for us.

Any lessons learned from your past collaborations? What would you do different the next time?

Every new project is a new story. Every client is unique and distinctive. The lesson you have learned working with one client might not work for another.

It’s amazing to feel passion to collaborate from the first email or call. If you understand that the client fully trusts you, it becomes a powerful stimulant for your team’s creativity. Probably the most proved principle is not to get involved in the projects for which you don’t feel passion.

Invaluable experience for me is the opportunity to work with people from all around the globe. It’s absolutely amazing how different we all are, how differently people communicate, think, create, negotiate and act. It’s really important not to treat cultural differences as barriers. On the contrary, when you see it as an advantage, plenty of new opportunities come.

Have you ever found that you had to prioritize the project over feelings or needs of people?

Our latest works combine experiences of different people now: it’s a mix of our creativity and knowledge. Working in a team you have a virtue to operate in a much more expanded field of view than working alone. Unfortunately, sometimes you have to postpone even brilliant ideas of your team, if you feel it would not work this time.

How do you make efficient decisions?

It depends on the problem you have to solve. If it’s about creativity, very casual things can help sometimes like a few days off in the forest or near the sea. Thought sometimes you have to feed your brain again and again to come up with something visually striking. If I need to recharge batteries swiftly for some bothersome business or bureaucratic issue, 10 minutes of intensive ping pong in the office might help as well.

Filmmaking involves thousands of decisions. How do you reduce the amount of decisions that you need to make?

We have a wonderful team and everyone knows what he is responsible for. That really helps in dealing with big projects. Another important thing is to learn to set the priorities and focus only on the most important issues.

How would you describe the difference between the visual art scene here in Lithuania and Europe or the rest of the world?

We are witnessing a huge explosion of creativity and quality. Actually we’ve become a source of inspiration to each other. Everything is so mixed and intertwined that all traditional differences, that we used to see, are vanishing now. In my opinion, contemporary visual language is more convenient to deliver the message than any other language in the world.

The viral creativity has dramatically affected creators, audience and the content too. Using new visual language we became able to tell new kinds of stories, we can see things and feel sensations, that were invisible, hidden and even unimaginable before.

That’s why it is the amazing time to be a visual storyteller. And listener as well.

How do you balance between the reality of business and the process while maintaining creative integrity?

If you start a company to make money, you become a businessman. Korb, which was my personal pseudonym as an artist at first, became a company, because I didn’t see any other way to proceed further with projects that I wanted to work on. It’s just a tool to organize all formalities.

We are quite small and we see it as a huge advantage, that we can work with big and challenging projects now, but we don’t need to be in stew regarding a lot of income and take jobs that we are not happy with. Design & VFX boutique right now is the best way for me personally to balance between business and creativity.

What public figures impress you and inspire your works?

Jim Jarmusch, Daniel Askil, Zaha Hadid, Anish Kapoor, Santiago Calatrava, Albert Einstein, Leonardo da Vinci, Muhammad Ali, Steve Reich, Ruichi Sakamoto, Carsten Nicolai, Robert Henke, Iris Van Herpen, David Gahan, Quentin Tarantino, Tilda Swinton and many more.

What were one of your most memorable moments?

You spend days and months exploring, creating, modeling and rendering, balancing between your personal, your team’s and client’s aspirations. Then you get comments, after that you get likes, shares, posts, views, embeds, your works become part of one big global visual story. And actually a fundamental part of your brain, soul, your life and entity.

A few months ago I was invited to present Korb at centre Pompidou in Paris at Hors Pistes festival. Before screening we decided to make a test to check quality, sound etc. I was sitting absolutely alone in a big empty cinema hall, looking at my works I was working on for months and years. It was really marvelous moment to see it on big screen, in such a quality and size, to listen to the sound through high-end system. And to imagine all these people, who will come to the screening, and their feelings. This little moment of seeing my works newly, in absolutely new context was really surprising for me.

What is your favourite audio record of all time? Do you often listen to the music and how much important for you is the quality of sound, innovation?

I listen to the music really often, mostly all the time in the office. It is a very important point both to my creativity and even to my daily life. But I can’t say that I have a favorite record and even favorite artist. Having such is a little bit risky for me to constrict in a certain circle of experiences.

Music and sound design are vital in our works. I am lucky enough that we have amazing friends in different parts of the world creating sound design, that help our stories to became not only visible and audible, but perceptible as well.

What projects, challenges KORB will face in the future?

We have just finished amazing project with Taiwan based design house JL Design. Four episodes for different idents were shot in Taipei, where our team captured actors bodies in order to have data about their movements. Every captured movement forms stunning digital sculpture. The project for CCTV Documentary Channel was full of technical, creative challenges and inspiring discoveries, but we couldn’t be happier with a final look. This project is another big step towards our perpetual challenge to keep moving on exploring the boundaries of multi-platform world.

KORB works:

Gale

Gale2

Gale3

Coca cola

Coca Cola2

Coca Cola3

Exhilo

Exhilo3

Exhilo2

Infinity water

Infinity water2

Infinity water3

mtv

mtv2

More about KORB:
WebsiteVimeoBehanceFacebookTwitter

Secret Thirteen Interview – James Blackshaw

$
0
0


The hands of virtuoso and the mind of a poet – an exclusive interview with James Blackshaw

James Blackshaw needs just 12 strings to create beautiful and floating tapestries and narratives of sound with their own turns and twists. His compositions remind me of Symbolist landscapes, where incredible painting skills are mixed with hidden depths and meanings, where secrets and symbols lie within beautiful sceneries. It seems, that James Blackshaw music is like some abstract idea, emotion or dream made real by the combination of virtuosic hands and poetic mind.

Recent collaboration with Lubomyr Melnik was an interesting artistic choice merging Lubomyr’s piano and James’ guitar into beautiful continuous structures, thus highlighting James improvising skills. The Ukrainian composer and English guitarist created a very organic dialogue of two instruments, where every note is like a drop in the powerful stream of sound. It was another masterpiece added to James contribution list, that already had such dream teams as Sailors With Wax Wings or Myrninerest.

In this exclusive interview for Secret Thirteen journal James talks about meeting Lubomyr in Estonia, the importance of real life and fiction, the process of composing and other things. Take a glimpse behind his skillfully crafted and indepth soundworld.

You recently collaborated with Lubomyr Melnyk. He is the pioneer of continuous music. What similar sensibilities did you find with Lubomyr? How did this collaboration start? What do you think of the concept of continuous music? Do you find your compositions similar to Lubomyr’s tapestries of sound? What did you gain from this collaboration?

Lubomyr is an incredible pianist and composer, who I’ve admired for quite some time. I’m really happy that he’s finally receiving some recognition for his work but he’s still largely underappreciated, in my opinion.

I think I first heard his music back around the time I was working on ‘Litany of Echoes’ and I felt like Lubomyr had already made the music I wanted to hear and make at that time, but for piano instead of guitar. We definitely share a great deal of sensibilities, not just in our approach to sonority, but in the state of mind we experience from making music and which we hope listeners experience too.

We first met at a festival in Estonia in 2008 where we were both performing. I started speaking to him at the merchandise table and he was curious as to what, as an English man, I was doing there. I told him I was also playing that night and he came along and watched me. I think something about the performance must have impressed him – he said that I’d created continuous music for the guitar and asked me if I’d like to collaborate. It wasn’t until early last year that we finally found that opportunity.

It was interesting to watch the way Lubomyr composes and plays and I gained the experience of making music more spontaneously and working with a hero of mine. Now I think I’m moving away from that sound, even if only temporarily, but I’d like to think I’d retain some of that sensibility.

How do you compose you tracks? Do you treat them like musical narratives or more like sound sculptures, images, ornaments, repetitive structures? Do you visualize your sound? With what other form of art could you compare your music?

In the past, typically it involves experimenting with tunings. Then I hear possibilities harmonically and melodically within that tuning. It’s more instinctive than anything else. I usually don’t know what I want to make, but I know what I don’t want to make.

I never visualize anything, nor any fixed narrative behind any one of my compositions. I read a book recently on how to write Fantasy novels. This might seem an odd thing to bring up at this point, but one thing I remember reading was an author’s suggestion that you draw inspiration from real life – your personal life or in general – to create this fantasy world, but it’s not enough just to change people’s names and their environment. You try to capture the essence of that person or of that experience and what made it memorable or poignant to you. In a way, as pretentious as this might sound, I think I’m just trying to capture the essence of many different important experiences in my life and translate them into music.

But of all forms of art, I think nothing is more similar to music than film, in my opinion.

Love is the Plan, Plan is the Death” is the title of your last album. The image on the cover is the picture of some sort of fire and tent in the dark. What is the meaning behind the title? Does the album cover somehow relate to it? Is it a concept album?

There’s no concept but there is an underlying theme and it’s one of resigning oneself to darkness and detachment from oneself. If that sounds depressing, my apologies – it was a very sad time for me when I made that album. The title itself comes from a James Tiptree Jr. story, a Science Fiction author whose work I really love. The music itself is not directly related to the story and neither is the cover art, which is the artist Yu’s interpretation of what the music means. I love layers of abstraction and I fear I’ve just spoiled the mystery somewhat.

What informs your music? Is it some spontaneous, improvised chords, some abstract thoughts, feelings, emotions, experiences? What impulses makes you create?

Books. Films. Boredom. Restlessness. Love.

Some of my favourite films include ‘The Conversation’, ‘Don’t Look Now’, ‘Stroszek’ and ‘Picnic At Hanging Rock’. Of more recent directors, I’m a big fan of Sion Sono and Nicolas Winding Refn’s work. I can see common themes between a lot of the films that resonate emotionally with me, particularly unseen fears and something alien or otherworldly captured in the world in which the characters inhabit and characters who are somewhat detached and isolated from that world themselves. I think the structure and movement of a lot of the films I love have a great musicality to them and also have great scores themselves. When film and music work in tandem in such a way to convey a feeling, it’s perhaps he most powerful and immediate form of expression for me.

I read quite a lot and I especially love sci-fiction and fantasy. Clark Ashton Smith, Fritz Lieber, James Tiptree Jr, Harlan Ellison and countless others authors have inspired my imagination a great deal. The last book I truly loved was ‘The Lies of Locke Lamora’ by Scott Lynch which I read for the first time earlier this year.

I can’t really explain how any of these things have influenced my music, if at all, but I assume anything that moves, excites me or stirs me into action must somehow end up playing at least some small subconscious part in whatever it is I’m making.

According on internet info you are from London, but based in Hastings. Why did you move to this rural seaside town? Is it a better place to be inspired and create than the urbanistic metropolis? How places and surroundings influence you?

It was initially largely a case of not being able to afford to live in London – one of the most expensive cities in the world – and continue working on music in the way that I do now, so I made the choice to move elsewhere. Now, I like it a lot here. It’s mostly quite and I’m a stone’s throw from the sea. I love visiting London, but I don’t miss the pace of life there. In terms of environment influencing my music, I’m not sure it does really. Music is a very internal thing for me.

What made you to include vocals in your latest album? It was quite an interesting turn having in mind, that the rest of your albums are absent of vocals?

I like Menace Ruine and Preterite a lot. Genevieve said she heard a vocal line in her head for that song, when I sent her the album prior to release and I was really happy to trust her to something great with it. I was also really curious to hear what it would sound like, how it would work in the context of an instrumental album and to throw a curveball, so to speak. I don’t think it’ll be the last time I incorporate vocals on one of my records.

How do you relate with your instrument? Do you have some piece of instrument you are particularly attached? How does it influence your music? What physical qualities are the most important? Why do you find 12-string guitar special and distinctive?

I have a love/hate relationship with the guitar. What else? It’s the instrument I probably feel most comfortable with, but I also can’t escape it somehow. It’s a bit of a trap creatively speaking. Perhaps the instruments I enjoy playing most is the piano, but I am also relatively limited in terms of what I can do as I’m not a great player.

The 12-string is a beautiful instrument, of course. It’s depth and resonance opened me up to playing a style that seemed to suit it and just wouldn’t have been possible for me at the time with a 6-string guitar.

What informs the titles/concepts of your songs and albums? How do you put your pieces into coherent whole? What informs the way you construct your album’s concept, tracklist, mood?

It’s all dictated to me by some kind of intuitiveness on my part, for better or worse, but I’m a great believer in not attempting to deconstruct those processes.

More about James Blackshaw:
WebsiteTumblrFacebook

Secret Thirteen Interview – Xhin

$
0
0


Secret-Thirteen-Interview-Xhin

By following Xhin’s retrospective mix of favourite records on Secret Thirteen mixes we present an exclusive mini interview with a mastermind himself. It wasn’t very easy to develop a conversation with mysterious Singaporean artist, but as Albert Einstein once said: “The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources”. This interview reveals some constructive, but useful facts about Xhin’s past, present insights and his sharp and concrete advices for upcoming artists. Also, we are very grateful to Stroboscopic Artefacts for our cooperation.

Lee Xhin (pronounced as “sheen”), the Singaporean electronic music producer, DJ, performer and sound designer, who lives and works in Singapore. Xhin has been diligently exploring diverse compositional techniques and colossal rhythmical textures since the late 1990′s. He is mostly related to more experimental and inventive side of techno music scene. By incorporating various stylistic fragments from distinct music styles such as IDM, ambient and bass music, Xhin constructs intensively expanding and shifting architectural sound structures. Xhin has had a very productive and progressive decade since 2003, when he independently released his first production. 3 studio albums and numerous solo and collaborative records were released by the authoritative labels such as Stroboscopic Artefacts, CLR, Token and others. The key point in his career was joining a Berlin based Stroboscopic Artefacts label, which was founded by Xhin’s good friend and colleague Lucy. Together they produced a couple of critically acclaimed records such as “LX2/LX3” and “LX4/LX5”. Constant support from techno scene legends such as Speedy J, Luke Slater and Ben Klock strengthened Xhin’s as well as SA position in the whole alternative music industry. Xhin has also been rapidly developing his name and skilled artist reputation by regularly touring all across the globe.

Right-click and save a copy of Xhin mix

INTERVIEW

Can you tell us a bit about your background? Where did you studied and who influenced you to explore musical processes? Maybe you were directed by your family or your first school teacher? How important is it to you?


When I was little, my dad used to be a huge fan of all disco/electronic stuff like Yellow Magic Orchestra, Kraftwerk etc. And my uncle was a rocker, who was obsessed with bands like Iron Maiden, Black Sabbath, Dokken etc. I started playing piano and guitar at a younger age and then got into forming bands during my teens before I had a keen interest in electronic music, when detroit techno was introduced to me by a good pal, while we were still in our national service years.

What is your studio practice like? Can you describe the process of making your pieces? Are you self-critical?


Ideas and inspiration have to come first. I will start to work on that by creating the desire elements on the synthesizers before jamming through on the computer.

Could you talk about a significant success or a noteworthy failure that was an important turning point in your career?


I think it was that time, when I decided to go back to my experimental and harder side of me after the release of the album “Greyscale”. I would say that was pretty much an important turning point in my career.

What is the most helpful advice anyone ever gave you when it comes to music? Can you share one or two examples?


When I was in my 20′s I remember there was this client, who said this to me: “Do things one at a time. Master one before moving on to the next.” It wasn’t really related to music at that time, but I still relate that to whatever I do these days.

In what other activities apart from music you are interested in? Do you feel sometimes that you are not giving enough time to other activities (math, science, arts, sports etc) that you are interested in? How do you schedule your time? Does other activity someway recharges you and inspires for perfection?


I manage my time on a reminder/calendar. I have been taking pictures lately. Photography is my new thing now. Not an expert, just a hobby to keep me inspired besides music making.

What are your thoughts about depression, insomnia and alcohol/drugs? Does these components are useful to make a successful and thoughtful work or maybe there are other much more effective ways to create something sublime?


I can’t really comment on those components, but I would say imagination and emotion can be quite powerful for inspiration.

What are some artists (past or present), whose work really excites you?


Too many to name… OK, here are some from my past and current listening: Autechre, AFX, Yellow Magic Orchestra, Ryuichi Sakamoto, Ben Frost, Nurse With Wound, The Observatory, Dir En Grey, Sugizo, The Haxan Cloak…

Your sound seems very dimensional and architectural. Who are some of your favorite installation artists or architects working today? Why do they draw your attention?


I don’t have any particular installation artist that inspires me, really. I’m just too obsessed with big cinematic soundscapes.

What are you working on now? What ideas or plans do you have for your
 future work? Could you elaborate on this?


I am working and experimenting on some newer stuff at the moment. Hopefully it will be another EP to be released this year.

What is your advice for beginner music producers? What awaits them in the complex music industry and what they should never do? Can you share your knowledge with our curious audience?


I’m not quite good in giving advices. All I can say is just do what you can do best with what you have. Also, diversity is the key word.

More about Xhin:
WebsiteFacebookSoundcloudTwitter

Secret Thirteen Interview – Joachim Sauter (ART+COM)

$
0
0


Joachim Sauter by Robert Wunsch (CEO of ART+COM)

Photo by Robert Wunsch

Purposeful and constructive mind that generates exemplary and monumental works – an exclusive interview with the foresighted Joachim Sauter

Joachim Sauter (b. 1959) is a German multimedia artist, CEO and lecturer spending his time between Berlin, Germany and Los Angeles, United States. He studied in the Academy of the Fine Arts and in the German Academy for Film and Television, both in Berlin. Following Bauhaus ideas of clean lines of function and simplicity in the late 1980′s Sauter together with other artists, designers, scientists and technologists founded the influential ART+COM organisation that explores the computer as a new medium. ART+COM, where Sauter is the creative director, became a conceptual and a fully functioning company in 1994. By developing original ideas that are both technologically and aesthetically unique and working according to the interdisciplinary principles ART+COM gradually gained a worldwide recognition and respect. Sauter shares his experience and knowledge not only inside ART+COM. He teaches at the University of the Arts in Berlin (UdK) and at UCLA, Los Angeles. ART+COM-Company-LOGOSauter worked with brands such as BMW, Esprit and Deutsche Bank as well as exhibited at the museums such as the Centre Pompidou, the Shanghai Art Museum, the Venice Biennale and other notable places.

Joachim Sauter received several awards including the ‘Golden Lion, Cannes’, the ‘D&AD Black Pencil’, the ‘Ars Electronica Interactive Award’, the ‘British Academy for Film and Television Interactive Award’, ADC New York and ADC Germany Gold, the ‘Grand Clio’, the ‘Red Dot Grand Prix’, the “Designaward of the Federal Republic of Gemany” and many other national and international awards.

In this Secret Thirteen interview Joachim Sauter speaks about the beginning of his career and the ideology behind it, reveals his future plans and influences. Sauter also tells about various aspects of his profession, close relationships with music and his works specifics.

Important annauncement! Berlin, June 21th 2013 – The upcoming MADE project SYMPHONIE CINÉTIQUE – THE POETRY OF MOTION brings together German media artist Joachim Sauter and Icelandic composer Ólafur Arnalds in a creative clash at MADE. More information can be found by visiting MADE webpage.

Symphonie-Cinetique_by Robert Wunsch

Joachim Sauter & Ólafur Arnalds. Photo by Robert Wunsch

INTERVIEW

From our perspective, you are a very established artist. You know what you are doing. You have been doing it for a long time. You know how you are going to approach things. How do you feel this position helps you to move forward? How do you benefit from it?

Joachim Sauter: In order to get to this point it took quite some detours, which in retrospective have been important and still influence my work. I started off by studying graphic design, then followed studies in film, which eventually led me to new media design and art. But it’s like getting to know a city: if you only walk in straight lines from one place to the other, you don’t see much and you will never understand the city’s entire geography. But if you take detours, explore alternative routes and check out neighbourhoods, you will progressively understand how the city is constructed. And on this basis you can make the right choices. For me, a creative director at ART+COM, this means that my knowledge of neighbouring disciplines makes it easier for me to assess the potential of an idea and to choose the right one. Because the difficult part in creative work is not to have ideas, but to pick the one that’s better than the rest.

Can you tell us a bit about your background? Where did you studied and who influenced you to explore arts? How important is it to you?

JS: I studied at the Academy of the Fine Arts and at the German Academy for Film and Television, both in Berlin. In the beginning of my professional career I was definitely influenced by the design principles of Bauhaus, such as stripping away any decoration and celebrating clean lines of function and simplicity. I was also impressed with the permeability between architecture, design, fine arts, film and design that Bauhaus promoted. These strong ideas have shaped my own approach and have motivated me to define clear design principles at ART+COM. Our design work is still very much orientated towards simplicity and clarity of form, but it has become much more poetic, ambiguous and encrypted than in the beginning. Where we still follow the Bauhaus completely is in its disregard of conventional distinctions between the “fine” and “applied” arts or, in our words, „media art“ and „media design.“ But we even go one step further in the fact, that designers, programmers and developers work interdisciplinary at ART+COM. Through this teamwork and synthesis we are able to develop original ideas that are both technologically and aesthetically unique.

“Kinetic Rain” Changi Airport Singapore from ART+COM

Most of your works are very spacious. They include the interesting use of surrounding space, context. What is space to you? Is it a blank canvass or challenge to deal with?

JS: First of all, space means challenge. The challenge lies in understand the space you create for. Very often our works are developed in response to a specific space. The installations that we invent for a given space often enhance it, bring it to the foreground, into people’s perception instead of covering it up. We like to think of it as adding layers to space, layers of information or of visual poetry. We create a dialogue between the space and our work that the viewer enters as a third and equal partner.

How would you describe the different phases of your work throughout your career and what are the themes or motivations that keep pushing your work forward?

JS: ART+COM was founded as early as in 1988. Quite naturally my work has been influenced by the medium it is based on: the personal computer. The first seven years from 1988 to 1995 were defined by independent technological and artistic experiments and commissioned research projects. This position gave the freedom to maintain independent perspective on technological innovations often hyped as the future successes elsewhere, but which did not necessarily turn out as such. New technologies were analysed, often dismissed, developed further and “abused.” In this first phase, the new medium’s essential qualities like interactivity and connectivity were identified and explored in a series of art, design and technology projects. In 1996 ART+COM entered its second seven-year phase. Our projects outgrew the screen and entered physical space. The new medium was gradually gaining ground in the public mind, and our independent work was accompanied by first commercial commissions for communication projects. These projects consciously celebrated the technology, which was made explicitly present, and could be immediately experienced. They followed the increasing acceptance of new media in various walks of life and the resulting knowledge about interaction principles and the use of interfaces. The open skepticism and ignorance, which the medium had been treated with in the early years morphed into a naive enthusiasm and fascination, a mood which culminated with the burst of the New Economy Bubble at the start of the new millennium. In recent years, after two decades of communicating in the virtual space of the internet, a desire for more communication in real spaces has been making itself manifest. The circle to the pre-digital era is closing and the physical and corporeal is back in the spotlight again, though infused and shaped with the qualities of the new medium. The material is supplanting the immaterial; the virtual complements the narrative’s physicality.

What tends to give you the greatest challenge and the greatest satisfaction with your work?

JS: Next to my creative work at ART+COM I teach at the University of the Arts in Berlin (UdK) and at UCLA, Los Angeles. I became professor at the UdK at the age of 32, which was not only determined through the fact that design with new media was a new field and teaching personnel was rare back then. But I consciously reentered art school as a teacher, because I felt that it is important to share experience and knowledge not only inside ART+COM, but externally as well. Today some of my satisfaction with what I do and did is generated by the success that my students have. Seeing them making progress and growing makes me proud. In addition to this, it satisfies me to see that today ART+COM is one of the protagonists of spatial communication with new media with a 25 year long history, that we will actually celebrate in the mid of this year. In 1988 we started as a group of enthusiasts, who simply wanted to explore the computer as a new medium, and became a company much later, in 1994. We did not know what was waiting ahead – the burst of the internet bubble, that would shake the whole field and eventually broke many of our competitors’ necks. Luckily we survived, because ART+COM was built on a solid basis, not on venture capital, and had followed a clear line of business, instead of jumping on every opportunity that had shown up. The biggest challenge has been to reinvent and refresh us again and again without moving into the wrong direction. It means to have both good instincts and a strong attitude.

Kinetic Logo at Deutsche Bank BrandSpace Frankfurt from ART+COM

How important is music to your life? Does it somehow influence your work? Could you share your recent favourite albums with our audience?

JS: Music is very important to me both in my private life and for my work. When describing our artworks we very often speak of a visual choreography, which suggests sequences of movement in connection with sound and even if not all works have a sound component, many of them are in some way or another related to sound. This quality is going to be “made audible” in an exhibition of some recent kinetic works that will take place in Berlin in July this year. Invited by MADE, an event and exhibition space, we will cooperate with Olafur Arnalds, a young musician from Iceland who is well known for his compositions mixing strings and piano with loops and edgy beats crossing-over from ambient/electronic to pop. It’s an artistic experiment that we are all looking forward to. Olafur is going to compose a sound piece in response to the pieces that we show. In anticipation to this collaboration I currently like to listen to his latest release For Now I am Winter.

What are you working on now? What ideas or plans do you have for your future work? Could you elaborate on this?

JS: At the moment I am working on a number of installations for indoor and outdoor public spaces. The common aspect of these different installations is the combination of reflective surfaces, light and movement, however all works respond individually to the context of the given space. With ART+COM studio I was invited to develop a concept for an artwork in Baku’s Heydar Aliyev Center, a new museum, gallery and conference centre, and the most ‚fluid’ architecture that Zaha Hadid Architects have ever built. Another, but very different spatial context for which I am working is the plaza of an office complex in the heart of Washington DC. The work that we conceived for this particular environment is a ‚time keeping piece’ that offers the current time only at closer view, while the predominant impression is hat of a constantly moving abstract form in visual interaction with the surrounding architecture. Of course, these are only two of the many projects we do at ART+COM and they are definitely more on the ‚arty side’ of our work. Alan Kay, the visionary IT pioneer at Xerox, said back in the 1970s: ”Look, the best way to predict the future is to invent it.” One of the challenges that we face in our field is that we indeed cannot just follow design trends and technological progress, but that we are the ones who set the directions. Asked for my plan for the future I can only reply very generally, that I am planning to do exactly this.

More about Joachim Sauter (ART+COM):
WebsiteART+COMVimeo

Secret Thirteen Interview – Ian Hawgood

$
0
0


Secret Thirteen Interview - Ian Hawgood

PHOTO BY FABIO ORSI

Cosmopolitan and analytic thoughts about music from different angles – a profound interview with the diligent and contemplative Ian Hawgood

Ian Hawgood is a British electronic music artist, promoter and curator, who divides his time between London, United Kingdom and Tokyo, Japan, although he constantly travels across the globe. Hawgood is also a passionate old hardware and synthesizers builder, collector and renovator. While being obsessed with reel-to-reel, field-recording and various vintage equipment, Hawgood creates warm aerial compositions. His works communicate the intimate language of music that contains strong spiritual and organic sense. Since 2007 Hawgood has already released a bunch of outstanding records on labels such as Hibernate, Experimedia, Under The Spire and his own imprints. Moreover, he also plays in projects such as Black Elk (with Tim Martin of Maps & Diagrams, Clem Leek and Danny Norbury) and Kinder Scout (with Danny Norbury and Offthesky). Hawgood owns and manages 4 different labels – Home Normal, Nomadic Kids Republic, Tokyo Droning and Koen Music. His labels gradually gained a worldwide recognition by releasing subtly experimental and atmospheric records from respectable musicians such as Bvdub, Pillowdiver, Offthesky, Celer and other talents.

The Shattered Light by Ian Hawgood

In this exclusive and in depth interview for Secret Thirteen Ian Hawgood talks about his picturesque life, upcoming works and shares some sharp insights about the social media impact to music nowadays. He reveals his early influences, compares different music scenes and defines the musical success. Also, Hawgood reasons about the situation in nowadays underground music scene, its contradictions and artistic meaningfulness.

Grab a warm drink, put his music on, push a play button and read this frank and comprehensive interview with the gifted man – Ian Hawgood.

INTERVIEW

Ian Hawgood in 113 words.

I live in Japan. My wife, pets and I live by a river in Tokyo, in an area called Nakajuku. I run the Home Normal, Nomadic Kids Republic, and Koen Music labels, plus am involved with a few others on the sly. I make music under my own name, but also under secret monikers, like to build my own gear and wire stuff up, and collect all sorts of musical objects. I’m a high school and university teacher / lecturer, as well as a sound engineer. I come from Oxford, although my family originally comes from Manchester and London. I’m incredibly anti-social but make a good game of it when I have to.

Could you say that you are successful musician? How would you rate your musical achievements?

How does one define success? When I made music just six years ago, I made it without any agenda… just because I had to. It was who I was. That hasn’t changed, but maybe the way I view the end work as a whole has. It is less about personal feeling and more about communicating with others in a way. Or better yet, communicating something deep within, so that it transcends one’s self and becomes a kind of communication of spirit that is mobile through the very language of music. So to make music, if it means something to you, then it is successful. If you release music beyond to people, who aren’t your friends for example, then success should be defined as how well the work communicates with others. I don’t mean how many people pick it up (which is the typical and bullshit way we judge ‘success’), but to what level. Does it mean something? Does it move them? My last two records have been successful in my eyes in both senses. Have they sold a crap-load? No. But have people responded to them in a deep way…yes. That’s success for me.

How did you develop your taste and inspirations?

I had hearing problems as a kid, so I didn’t really hear a record properly until I was about 11. That didn’t stop my family from singing praise songs around the piano and listening to classical music on record every night. My first cassette was ‘Off The Wall’ by Michael Jackson. I listened to that and ‘Bad’, plus some P.M.Dawn and a ‘Now’ (7 I think) compilation until I was 15 years old. When I was fifteen I sort of fell into the indie crowd (there were two of us), and got into local bands like Radiohead, Ride, stuff like that. At sixteen I discovered an N.W.A cassette in the school field and started listening to hip-hop and rap. At the same time I randomly came across Lawnmower Deth in a record store one day, and got really into a lot of thrash like Xentrix, Anvil Bitch…I can’t remember the names now, but I was really into that and hip-hop for like a year or so. I actually got bullied for listening to them! Once I changed schools I joined another indie crowd (again there were just two of us) and we soon moved from PWEI and Inspiral Carpets, and started listening to Warp and Aphex a lot. Then on my gap year a friend introduced me to Eno and it sort of changed my life really. Budd, Eno, Nick Drake, Miles Davis, John Coltrane and BOC became the music I obsessively listened to on my travels (and I travelled a lot during and just after university). I think by this moment I’d had a good three years of musical development and my interests, as diverse as they have always been, took off from there.

Do you follow the latest musical production and hardware technologies?

Not religiously, but I am a gear nut to be honest. I mean, I read up about a lot of stuff, but I am also constantly educating myself in old technology as that is more my area. I fix old tape machines and buy old broken keyboards to either fix or bend, plus I make different instruments both electronic and acoustic, so a lot of my time is filled with that.

Wolven (A Modern Interpretation) by Ian Hawgood & Friends

Can you describe from beginning to end how the material – let’s say a new album – is made? Describe where the sound concept comes from, what influenced you, how you decided on the timbre or modulations or mood, how it was developed and expanded?

It depends on the album, or work. I mean, I have a lot of gear and my set-up is always changing, so its really hard to describe this concisely. However, I usually kick off with sketches on a four track cassette recorder or a two track reel-to-reel. I went through a patch, where I recorded straight into laptop, but it didn’t work for me…I just found it very unnatural. I then edit these by transferring parts onto one of my larger reels as the sound is just so warm and fuzzy. I’ll then process from there, sometimes through a computer, or layering through some outboard gear to touch things up as I see fit. That’s it in a nutshell.

One thing across all my work is that I hate things being too clean or crisp, so I prefer using analog gear as convoluted as that might sound. At each part of the chain I am into pretty old, warbly gear. I’ve actually travelled around a lot to pick stuff up that I might use one sound on a record for, or that has a function or tone that I like and need for a record. I just need a bit of dirt and grime to my music, and knowing and using older, slightly banged-up gear helps.

What makes your work as an artist meaningful?

Music is always (hopefully) meaningful to an artist on a personal level. The meaningfulness comes from the simple fact that the music is an extension of me, who I am and what drives me. What makes it meaningful to others, I think, is the fact that I put everything into the record, not just a spiritual self, or base self, but thought into the whole. I think people get a lot out of that and why my last couple of records seem to be lasting time and again with people, which is nice. On another level, and the reason why one goes public, I suppose, is that you connect to a person, people, on a very deep level, only through the language of music. It is a spiritual contact, no matter what the genre, and that makes it incredibly meaningful.

How important is a sound quality to you as a producer, label manager and as a listener?

That’s a bit of a double-edged sword really. If I say ‘very’ then it seems like I don’t listen to grimy, filthy music, but need to hear things crystal clear. But still, I have to answer ‘very important’. If I hear something which doesn’t feel organic, or natural, I just switch right off as its not who I am. So its important, very, but by ‘quality’ I don’t mean something clear as day, I mean something which has been made thoughtfully and has depth. It can be a muddy recording for all I care, but if it works and is whole, natural, then great. This is the same for me as a label owner, producer and listener.

What is the creative concept behind Home Normal, Nomadic Kids Republic and Tokyo Droning labels you manage?

On a very basic level, Home Normal is about organic, soulful music. I set the label up with a focus on artists, who let the music and beautiful, minimal photography and design, do the talking. It is slowly evolving with more of a focus on film works, and quite a lot of noise and minimal south-east Asian influences coming on board for next year.

Nomadic Kids Republic is more focused (now at least) on electronic works. It has a whole new team running things, so I am left to curate from distance really. It has been on hiatus since September but will be back after the summer with some amazing releases. Each record comes as a double package with live works and remixes added, and we are working with some awesome Japanese designers on these.

Tokyo Droning was focused on more experimental (for want of a better word) outings by Home Normal artists, such as live shows and installation work. However, Tokyo Droning as it was is now basically closed. It has evolved into something else which is still a ways off, but we were forced to stop the original label as we used locally made paper, but they eventually went broke after the earthquake as the company were from Fukushima. Still, it’ll be back in a different form and with a different team next year sometime.

Finally, Koen Music (KOMU), is my own small imprint for works I feel I don’t want to attach to the labels. I like to keep my own works and collaborations separate now, so this is a home for them. Our first few releases were The Shattered Light, Wolven (which was a split with Hibernate), and ‘Sparks’ by The Black Elk Quartet (w/ Tim Martin, Clem Leek, and Danny Norbury). KOMU has done really well and I am really proud of the work we have put out, and are about to put out later in the year.

Considering sale price and the record preparing process (mastering, design, marketing etc.), what balance have you found between these two variables in order to give value to your label releases?

In the modern market? With the postage costs of today? Putting out music I genuinely believe in hand on heart and not being swayed by what’s ‘in’? There isn’t a balance really. Postage has gone up so much we actually lose on distribution now and only make back the balance of that through the Japanese market, store sales and digital. I’m a mastering engineer by trade, so I master most of the works, but sometimes I just don’t have the time, but that cuts out some of the cost. We do market more digitally now as its easier, but many reviewers still ask for a physical copy which is incredibly expensive. So in terms of balance, its impossible really, especially if you want to provide something which is affordable to your customers/fans. Huge labels with huge distributors who stamp all over the little guys are just about ok, but us little guys… we have to work damn hard to just pretend there is any balance at all.

In your opinion, what parts of the world today are the most fertile in terms of development and growth of new musicians? Why you think so?

For all appearances, Japan for sure. They support Japanese artists a lot Here, which is really great, but its also typical of a protectionist mentality here. However, if you are a new artist, it is probably one of the few countries in the world, where you will get amazing backing compared to most other countries where new artists have a really hard time breaking in so they are recognised. But it also means a lot of crap comes out and is promoted just because of an artist’s nationality, and especially if they are mates with someone who is ‘in’. That creates a stagnant scene, and in a country where people are so loyal with their record buying, that’s a really bad move, in my opinion. So Japan is really good on the surface for new artists, but for new music and evolution – no. That’s just not really something that happens here sadly. Saying that, when it works, it really works. It is wonderful to see a stand and posters for these new artists in somewhere like Tower Records in Shibuya, where in other countries people wouldn’t even try to stock it. So that’s a good side of it.

If you want something genuinely new and interesting, the best places right now (for me), are south east Asia, India, parts of Africa, and Indonesia especially. I’ve seen and heard incredible underground music in Indonesia, and India especially. Totally earthy, wild, and unique. There is so much good music there in the local scenes, and the kids really know their stuff as well. We’ve had a lot of incredible demos from kids, not more than 18 years old some of them, that are so free and unhindered from scenes and music politics. I think its simply down to the right amount of wildness in the local communities. It is a kind of wildness we in Britain had a while back, but which has died out a bit as life is just too easy now. You’ve got to blame Labour for that though. Thatcherism had its perks after all. You need a bit of wild, a bit of anger, a bit of edge, to create music which is really something. Our growing need for something immediate has ruined that a bit. But in countries where kids don’t necessarily have laptops as a given, or have Facebook and other social media on all the damn time, when things are a bit more old school, things get interesting.

There is one other place that I know of where there is sort of a mini-scene happening in terms of very organic, instrumental, unique minimal works: Italy. I have no idea why though. I lived there for a while and the music I came across was just awful. But in the past couple of years there have been a growing number of artists doing remarkable things there. Maybe its something to do with the heat because many are from the south (where I lived…Puglia)! I don’t know. But something is going on there and its great. Giulio Aldinucci is probably at the head of the class right now. I am biased, but the guy should be regarded as a national treasure…he’s that good.

Can you elaborate your insights about the essential differences between London and Tokyo ambient music scenes?

I think both countries are so small we can just stick to Japan and the UK, rather than the capitals. The UK certainly had a ‘scene’ for a couple of years with Home Normal, Hibernate, Under The Spire etc a while back. UK stores loved the scene, but it was total bullshit really as Home Normal for example, was never an ambient label. They just used that to sell records. Such genre definitions are supposed to make buying music clearer, or quicker even. The problem with scenes is they need these definitions for the sell, but the end result is that it limits labels and artists. The follow-up issue then is that the market gets flooded, and people who don’t really care about music, which is perhaps a bit too ‘quiet’ for their attention spans, mix absolute crap with brilliant new music as they can’t tell the difference. They are there trying to promote music (actually its themselves) or sell it, but they have no clue about what real, thoughtful, slowly evolving music is.

So right now the ‘scene’ so called is dead, but only as a ‘scene’. The music is as vibrant, possibly more so, than it ever was, because the influence is now filtering through. But there is seemingly no support for it now as the stores and magazines (the scene ‘setters’) have moved on. However, the stupid thing is there was never really much of a scene. People still follow beautiful music. If something is made right, people will still somehow find it and take it on board. The ‘setters’ miss that, and set nothing. Its the way of things, especially in the UK, and its rather silly really, but it’ll come around again as it always does.

Japan is different because there was never really a noted ‘scene’, but the artists who were popular before things kicked on in the UK (and USA / Europe for that matter), are still popular now. Nothing has changed, but herein lies the problem. There are a handful who all support each other which is nice, but its a small group who never support new artists unless they are friends. The same people play the same shows over and over, and its a little bit boring really. I found myself in that a few years ago, but got totally sick of it, and once we moved out into the sticks, I just happily left that behind.

So the difference is that there is very good support for ambient artists in Japan, if they are connected in the right way only though. But the music as a result of this, is a little bit limited, uninspired on the whole, for my tastes. In the UK though, I think the result of a lack of support will actually revive the music side of things. Scenes ruin the music they are supposed to be promoting and celebrating, period. A certain distributor or webzine etc will make the same comment about the (amazing) music of Taylor Deupree, for example, and someone, who has fallen asleep on their keyboard, recorded it, and claimed it as ‘drone’ music. They will call it ‘fluffy pillow music’, missing the depth of the former entirely. People aren’t stupid and realise that the person they have promoted is talentless, but then switch off the scene as they blame that rather than the fact that they trusted a store who is only interested in money.

Essentially, people who deal in music need to understand that a Romeo and Juliet is not the same as a Mills and Boon. They might be about love, but they need to read the book to understand the contents and depth of what’s inside. It is an inherent problem with the music we make; that it takes time to listen, that you can’t capture it in a press blurb and a 30 second clip. The one good thing about this is that when the scenes fade, the people who shouldn’t even be in the same vicinity go onto the ‘in’ genre and the true artists shine through again, a scene restarts to sell records, and so it goes on and on in a cyclical fashion. Which is better? The limited but solid path, or the cyclical spurts of brilliance? They both have their flaws of course, but its the way of things.

If you weren’t in music industry, what would you like to be and why?

A farmer with a porch and instruments everywhere (which isn’t far off actually). Pretty much who I am now, only probably slightly further down the line and just sending tapes to friends of my music.

What exciting projects, performances or releases await in the near future? Could you present them in depth for our curious readers?

Wow, ok, well I didn’t release anything for ages but have been working on a bunch of stuff with friends for years. They are all about ready now so this year to next will be kind of flooded with these great projects years in the making. So here’s a list to make things a little easier:

- Lantscap is the moniker for my work with Warren Kroll (Forrest) and we completed out debut ‘Varying Degrees of Alive’ a couple of years ago now. It’ll be out on the awesome Infraction label on vinyl in the next couple of months. Its mostly guitar stomping ambient, with some very pretty little twists along the way.

- Rion is a collaboration with an old friend of mine, Ryo Nakata. Our debut ‘Fireflies’ will be out on Hibernate just after the summer. We spent an age working on the record and its sort of a nice guitar drone with wheezy organ, bells, vibraphone, harmonium etc record. We called it the new Vincent Gallo record, without Vincent Gallo if that is any indication.

- The Whalers Collective is a group consisting of myself and Gareth Davis, with Ryo again, Felicia Atkinson, and Rie Mitsutake. The album was made a few years ago now, but we found ourselves playing around with it for a while. John Twells mastered it a few months ago and did an amazing job. Its a pretty wild drone record, with Gareth on bass and contrabass clarinet, myself on gamelan, double bass and tapes, Rie on vox, Ryo on guitar, and Felicia on ukelele and vox as well…probably the record I’ve been involved in that I’ve listened to the most.

- Spent the past three plus years working on the new Koen Park material when I swore I would close down the moniker. I kept getting invited to release more music as I just stopped after the success of the Experimedia release, but eventually decided to work on more electronic-type work again. Probably won’t be under the old moniker though but will be out on two amazing labels (secret for now I am afraid) next year.

- My old mate Tim Martin (Maps and Diagrams) and I are finishing up the new Black Elk Quartet record which has taken longer than expected. ‘Anchor’ should be out before the end of the year. We’re also working on a very secretive series of albums (the first of which is complete and will be out in the next couple of months) which focus on decayed tape recordings and sound incredible. Totally different work for us and really very proud of this indeed.

– Taylor Deupree just sent over the final masters for a project called ‘Tiny Isles’ which has been on the go for about 4 years. It started as a project between Christopher Hipgrave and myself, but then opened up to include Jason Corder, with the help of Antony Harrison, Ben Chatwin, Rie Mitsutake, and Erik Schoster. The album will be out in August on Koen Music.

- Talking of Jason Corder – our Kinder Scout project (with Danny Norbury) will go live at the HomeNormalism festival in August in London. Its going to be incredible and the new work is so so good, if I do say so myself. The festival will see audio/visual performances from offthesky and Orla Wren (who will also release his new album and dvd on the day), with Fabio Orsi, Wil Bolton, Pillowdiver, Isnaj Dui, Astrid, Stefano Guzzetti, and Kinder Scout playing, and Paco Sala and Hybernation on DJing duties. Should be an incredible couple of nights in London. I think Kinder Scout will probably be producing an album from the material we’ve been prepping and on the night.

- Wil Bolton and I are close to finishing our collaboration. We’ve known each other for years now, so its great to be doing something together. Probably looking at a post-summer release on KOMU.

- Ben Jones (one of my best friends from uni and who helped set-up Home Normal) and I have a new project called Wraith vs Wrath. We have completed a work in a series of ten which will be digitally released every few months on KOMU. The first in the series is called Kex | Lux and will be out on June 7th in digital format only. It was mastered by James Plotkin and sounds great. Its taken us about 12-13 years to make the series as we kept messing around with the tapes and post-recorded reels obsessively. As a result the whole series is quite gritty, muddy work, with lots of crackle and splice cuts across it…which is a good thing!

- James is actually mastering a lot of my old releases which went out in very limited numbers or on netlabels. These will be re-issued over the next year, with the first being ‘Wolfskin’ on the 30th of June, followed by ‘We Are Better For Being Built This Way’ on the 14th of July. The rest will be out post-summer.

- Brian Green and I started work on a project called Ghosts In The Alleys (Of Your Heart). James P is just mastering this now and it should be out at the end of August on CD. It started out as simple meditations on singing bowls and violin, but then I started thrashing around on my guitar and running it through reels – so its this incredibly noisy, wild, beautiful beast really.

- Finally, Danny Norbury and I are working on re-edits of my very old Mobeer and U-Cover releases. These were split into two 3″ releases but were actually supposed to be part of an album (with another previously unreleased track) which has had the working title of ‘Every Solstice, A Fire’ for a while. I am not sure when we’ll be done with this but its something that I am really excited about finally completing.

So there you go – been a busy few years but everything is just suddenly coming to a head at the same time for one reason or the other.

Are you happy? Maybe you would like to say something important to your family, friends, fans and all die-hard music lovers?

Yeah. Yeah, I really am. None of my friends will read this as they couldn’t give a toss about my music, and for that I am thankful. But I would like to say how much I appreciate anyone who picks up any of the stuff I create, or am a small part of…it means so much to me, and has helped me to create, and through creation understand more of who I am which is all anyone can really ask for.

More about Ian Hawgood:
WebsiteFacebookTwitter

Secret Thirteen Interview – The Soft Moon

$
0
0


Secret Thirteen Interview - The Soft Moon

PHOTO BY JULIE BONATO

Between introspection and retrofuturism – an indepth interview with The Soft Moon’s Luis Vasquez

The Soft Moon manages to channel the post punk romanticism through the raw madness of kraut influenced futurism. It might be one man’s inner journey to himself, but at the same time it is very easy for the listener to be immersed into Luis Vasquez’s post apocalyptic soundscapes. As Luis points out, Soft Moon is not a band or a music project, but rather a separate world with its own rules, emotions and aesthetics, sometimes reminding some odd black and white German expressionist film. Here music, live performances, cover arts, videos are merged into subtly elegant, aggressive, terrifying, but at the same time very energetic and coherent whole.

Last year The Soft Moon released their sophomore full length Zeros, that represents the more straightforward and punkish side of Luis. After a while we catched him in Venice (by Skype, of course) in the middle of European tour for this exclusive interview. Here the reader can take a glimpse to the backstage, where reoccurring nightmares, introspection, retrofuturism, technological dystopias and various kinds of art forms inform the dark, but still hopeful world of The Soft Moon.

INTERVIEW

Zeros is more straightforward and aggressive than your self titled debut. Why there is such shift in style? Why there is such difference?

Well, for the first record I wrote it, produced and recorded it by myself in my apartment not really knowing what I was doing. And the biggest difference between this one and Zeros is that, even though, I still wrote Zeros at home, but I took everything into a more professional environment and I worked with an engineer. And so I was able to be a little more louder and aggressive. I mean, it also probably has to do with what was happening with my life at the time. I am affected by everything that’s happening mainly subconsciously. It’s always like I look back at it in hindsight and realize, ahhh ok, now I know why I did this, I did that. But I think I wasn’t so happy with my living situation, so that’s why it is a lot more aggression on Zeros. But I think the main difference is just working in a more professional environment in an actual studio.

Do you have any ideas about your next album already? What kind of direction are you going to take further?

You know, I just let things to go naturally and I don’t like to predetermine or think about what I am going to write until I am actually sitting down and writing. But I do know, that I want to become a little more percussion heavy. So, I am planning to bring more of a primal aspect in terms of percussion and my heritage.

The Soft Moon - Julie Bonato

PHOTO BY JULIE BONATO

As far as we know you grew up in Mojave desert, so you plan to incorporate some things from your heritage into your music?

Yeah, my family is from Cuba, so I grew up with a lot of that music as a child hearing in the background. My uncle was a percussionist. That was my earliest memory of him. He went to prison, so… When I was a young kid, I remember him being a percussionist and that was my last memory of him. So, therefore it’s one of my first memories in terms of being a musician.

So, basically this emphasis on percussions is what we might expect.

Yeah, that’s the one thing I can say, that would be expected. Everything else I have no idea, I am not sure how I am going to be feeling at the time of the writing process or what experiences I have yet to come. And then in the near future before I start writing everything can happen.

The Soft Moon has many elements from different genres like 80′s post punk, krautrock, some synth stuff. But basically you rely on 80′s post punk structure, but your music has some futuristic feeling as well. Where does your music stands in terms of present and past? How past and present influences are important in terms of creating the sound? What is more important in creating – present or past?

It’s the equal combination of the two. I’d like to call my music retro futurism, so it’s 50-50 of the past and future. The past is really important, because the initial mean of The Soft Moon was to go back to my past and learn more about my childhood, that I blocked out, kind of trying to discover my past, but at the same time living in the future and thinking about the future too. Also, the reason why the future plays an important part, because it is almost like a reaction to today’s technology. I think that for me it is important to create something very honest and sincere and very human, because we are living in such an age of technology, so the future aspect of The Soft Moon is the reaction to technology.

What is your general opinion about the future of mankind and technology? Are you generally optimistic? We can feel slightly dystopian moods in your songs. So, what’s your vision of the future?

I am generally an optimistic person, but for me humanity and the future is kind of a dark path. I have these reoccurring nightmares about the end of the world. I’ve just had one the other night. They happen all the time. So, I feel like we’re kind of destroying and as human beings we are like a virus destroying nature and our own existence. But in some weird way, I find it romantic. It’s something I think about all the time and try to figure out what my viewpoint really is on it, but deep inside it is kind of a dark feeling.

Maybe you could tell us in more detail about one of your nightmares?

It’s funny, because I’ve had maybe at least a hundred end of the world apocalyptic dreams. It’s different every single time. Sometimes I am super afraid and there are other times, when it’s peaceful as the world is ending and I accept it and close my eyes within my dream. But the one I just had it was two nights ago. My family was in it, my mom was in it. And basically it was like a gravity kind of disappears and everything is sliding one direction. Sliding in high rate and most of the time some sort of buildings or skyscrapers were sliding. And I am crumbling with the building and moving in a really fast rate. And then somehow I tend to survive usually. I am one of the few left survivors. It was like a movie, I guess. In this one it was weird, because after the world ended I managed to stay alive with my mom. But then I started seeing life reform again. It was like God was creating this web in front of my eyes. Creating life again. It was really interesting to see that. Then I woke up.

In one of the past interviews you mentioned that you create music to know yourself better. Does it really help to achieve this goal? How do you find the balance between creating the music for more introspective reasons and communicating with the listener? Is it difficult?

It’s extremely difficult, in fact. I started this project for therapeutic reasons to help myself feel more sane. But in fact, the opposite has occurred. I feel like I am going crazier. Honestly, I am going a little more insane the deeper I go. And then at the same time, of course, I am communicating with listeners. I am learning about myself and at the same time there are listeners along with me through the journey. So, I feel very vulnerable, because I am exposing so much. I can’t help, but expose myself. The whole purpose of this project is for me to be completely honest with myself. But it does become very difficult and the fact that I am expressing myself to strangers… Yeah, I am just becoming more vulnerable. And I am actually working on trying to find that balance or I can just keep going and see what happens. But at the same time I have no regrets, that I am going a little crazier and getting more emotional and sensitive. But I guess it happens for a reason. Something is happening for a reason. My life is pretty insane. I look back all the time and something is going right, something is happening for a reason.

Having in mind the fact, that Soft Moon started as a one man project, does the presence of other musicians distorts your initial vision or do they contribute to it organically?

Well, I think it is very important that when it comes to the writing aspect of the project, that it’s my vision. The music is about my life, about my personal journey, it’s for therapeutic reasons, so there is that aspect, which I think is important for me to maintain that vision. And then there is the live aspect, where the band members come in and they can open up within that world and contribute their own unique style and ideas. So, that’s when they come in in terms of being creative and adding to The Soft Moon.

Another this is your cover art of your records. You used to work as a fashion graphic designer, so do you still employ those skills in creating your cover art and how important for you in general is the cover art and the visual side of the band as well as image? You use lots of stage lights.

I find this very important. I consider Soft Moon more like art project rather than just a band. So due to that all stimulation is important. I like to create a separate world. Especially with light performance. I would like to encompass the viewers as much as possible and stimulate as much as senses as possible. Just to encompass the listener and bring into the world. So therefore even with the art work on the album covers and packages and stuff like that for me it’s important to create a world. It’s not just about the music, it’s about the world.

The Soft Moon album artwork

What other art forms or music inspire you as a person and your project?

Everything. In fact, I think, music is probably the second area of influence for me. I am inspired by existence and just contemplating life and my own biology. I am just curious about being a human being and just life itself is probably the biggest inspiration as well as nature, animals, reptiles. Considering the music, I love it and I think it is the best tool to express myself. I definitely have influences when it comes to music. But overall, I would say just existence itself is the biggest influence.

Why did you call your album Zeros? What’s the meaning behind that?

Zeros is a conceptual album. From start to finish I wanted it to be like an art installment or novel. And the concept behind it was to play into those nightmares I always have, those post apocalyptic nightmares. I wanted to create an album that lives in the post apocalypse, so therefore Zeros represents everything starting over again.

But at the same time it is the beginning of something?

Yeah, that’s why the opening title track It Ends is created to represent the world ending and then every song after that is the song that exists in the post apocalypse.

What about your videos? Are they continuation of your music or an entirely separate world? How do you come with the ideas for them?

They are separate. In the beginning the videos tied back more to cover art and things like that, you know, geometric shapes, constructivism and all that stuff. And now the videos becoming their own thing, like Insides and the latest video Want. Want just really represents the actual track and how I felt, what that track means to me. So they are becoming their own little thing now and expanding. And also to notice, the last video was in color, while everything up to that was in black and white. So, they are becoming their own little entity.

Maybe you have some movies, that influence your videos?

Yeah. For example, Want was inspired by Gaspard Noe’s Enter The Void. Another inspiration is Darren Aronofsky’s film Pi. Another film is Possession. Also slasher films, serial killer films, drug addiction films. I am also inspired by David Lynch and Cronenberg and even 1920′s German expressionism films. Just everything that’s cool and weird.

What are your future plans? Next album? As far as we know, you are touring at the moment?

Yeah, right now I am in Venice, Italy hanging out. Then we will go on tour in about one week. We will go for a two week tour and then I think in September I will stay in Berlin or Paris for a while and start to write the next album. And at the end of the year I will be taking a long break to focus 100 percent on the third record.

How do you like Europe by the way?

It’s funny, because I feel like I am here more than I am in the States these days, so I am getting quite used to it. And I definitely enjoy it.

Is there a big difference between touring Europe and the States?

Yes. Touring the States is a pain in the ass. I mean, New York is cool as well as Los Angeles and San Francisco, both East Coast and West Coast are great, Chicago is cool. But everywhere else in the States the people are not resonating with The Soft Moon as much as Europe does. I mean, here we sell more shows and the capacities are larger, people just seem to get the project more and they understand it. In the States it is a little more difficult.

We heard the same words from many musicians. It’s quite a tendency.

Yeah, Europeans seem to connect with music on a deeper level or just in a different way. It has more meaning out there, it’s still considered an art form, whereas in the States it’s just like everyone has a band or anyone can make music, so it’s not as respective.

Nowadays in music we face a large tendency in goth revival (e.g. Captured Tracks, Dark Entries, Electric Voice labels). Having mind that you play in some goth festivals, do you consider yourself part of this scene?

I personally don’t, but if the fans consider The Soft Moon in that category or within that genre, I’m open to it. I did not really grow up listening to any goth music. The closest I got was The Cure, but everyone listens to The Cure. For some reason, when I write music, it just comes out dark. I don’t know, it’s just the way it comes out. It’s very natural for me. It was funny, because in the very beginning, when I did my first release with Captured Tracks, all these journalists were comparing me to these bands, that I’ve never heard of. And there was a lot of goth bands, so I was doing research, because I had to listen to these bands and then I realized, that there are definitely a lot of comparisons. I always wondered about that. For me, I guess, all those bands, all the musicians in those bands are kindred spirits. We just think alike. But I wasn’t really trying to revive goth. I fact, I was anti goth in high school. I was just a punk rocker. But I am totally open, how people interpret the music.

More about The Soft Moon:
WebsiteFacebookTwitter


Secret Thirteen Interview – The Sight Below

$
0
0


Secret Thirteen Interview - The Sight Below - Rafael Anton Irisarri

PHOTO BY SEAN CURTIS PATRICK

Painting the sonic landscape – the exclusive interview with The Sight Below

The Sight Below provides us with the beautiful sonic shelter from all the modern noise. Rafael Anton Irisarri, the man behind the project, creates the emotionally spacious and mesmerizing shoegaze/drone/ambient soundscapes intertwined with subtle dub/techno pulsations. No wonder he often has Simon Scott as collaborator and companion as The Sight Below has many similar sensibilities with heart-breaking multi layered guitar constructions of Slowdive. It is not the music to dip into while browsing some internet music listening platforms. This sound should be appreciated in an isolated moment during some special time of the day or even night. And might requite many listens to unfold.

The personality of Rafael himself seem to reflect and define his sound very accurately. So does his Substrata festival. In this interview the sonic painter speaks about the sources of his sound, the devaluation of music in the internet times, his inspirations, the forthcoming album, the origins and development of Substrata festival.

INTERVIEW

In the hyper-technological world of today, it seems that the brain is becoming increasingly disconnected from the ears. How has this affected such activities as sound design and recording?

For the past several years, I’ve been concerned with this same issue. It’s amazing, that we have instant access to information anywhere in the world, but simultaneously miss out on what is most immediate to us. Take, for example, how we listen to music these days: it’s mostly online, jumping from one thing to the next, sometimes in a race to find and consume the “next big thing.” The social media “revolution” didn’t really level the playing field, all it did was create a digital clutter to make it harder to navigate and find something meaningful. It also made everyone spout an opinion and become a pseudo-tastemaker for their limited audience. Works that take months to produce, or in some cases even years, can now be completely devalued in just one posting online. And of course, there is no time to listen to something (let it sit for a little bit then listen again before forming an opinion) – everyone has got to be the FIRST to say something, whatever that may be! Some of the music I love the most took many listens to grow on me. Is it possible to experience the same today?

Furthermore, many of us nowadays allow a computer algorithm direct what we should listen to next based on a series of predetermined marketing parameters. One thing I really appreciated while growing up and discovering music was the fact, that I had only so many records. I didn’t have much money, so my collection was fairly small (but potent), so I would hang on to an album for a very long time and listen to it more frequently. This begs the question: what is the point of having access to 100K songs, if you will only listen to a very small percentage anyway? A friend of mine works for a large software company (I live in Seattle, so you can guess which one) in the music division, creating products similar to Spotify. During some research, he discovered, that out of millions of songs in the company’s database only about 12% were played more than once. This is so telling of exactly what is wrong with us today. We’ve got no focus. I strongly believe the pervasive pandering to the self-defined needs of ADD culture is precisely what’s amiss with our relationship to experience today, and refuse to participate or contribute to it. I don’t want to make any music that provides instant gratification to the listener on first listen.

Do you consider yourself a conceptualist/sound designer/musician?

A colleague of mine years ago told me we were more like a car mechanics, but for music. I agree with that assessment. I’m a full-time artist/producer/composer, this means I’ve got to be prepared to wear many hats and switch gears from project to project. And that’s fine for me, I enjoy everything that I do – from mastering other people’s music and embellishing it to remixing and just producing works for others. Just like a car mechanic…

The Sight Below (Rafael Anton Irisarri)

PHOTO BY SEAN CURTIS PATRICK

What inspires you for your artistic investigation?

It depends. Inspiration comes from many sources – anything from a good book to a great film, an amazing photograph, a unique sound, a new piece of music-making gear. It’s hard to pinpoint. Sometimes ideas just come out of thin air – a melody gets stuck in your head and you need to bring it out. I know it’s pretty cliché thing to say, but it is so true though. I remember many years ago, I woke up with a piano motif in my head, and for days, I kept hearing the same notes, so I finally played and recorded it. Years later, I found that recording and it became the basis for an entire composition. Lesson here is: never discard anything that comes unexpectedly.

What is the creative concept behind your new album coming out on Room40?

This new album is the second album in a series of landscape-inspired musical renderings. As you may remember, my first album for the label was based on my immediate surroundings, the Pacific Northwest and its pop/folk cultural references. With ‘The Unintentional Sea” I’m exploring the idea of transformation of place. The inspiration behind it is The Salton Sea, a failed river re-direction that happened in California at the beginning of the 20th century. It was an ecological man-made disaster – it created this artificial sea, which, in the 1950′s, was seized and rebranded by corporate land developers, flipping it into a dream getaway destination for West Coast elites. Of course, before long, record temperatures and a rising level of water mineralization led to the mass death of fish and other wildlife in the area, and in turn, so too did the resort town’s population: everyone living there skipped town and left behind a vast post-human deserted wasteland. It’s really heartbreaking and depressing. We are the worst of all species.

How important is the sound quality in your recordings and in your daily life?

It depends really. I believe content ultimately is more important. What’s the point of having a perfect sound quality, but nothing interesting to say? Some of my favorite recordings are not technically perfect but they have an aesthetic I appreciate very much. Ultimately, what sounds good for me could be horrible sounding for another person. I do, however, appreciate when things are done with great care, you know, great effort and dedication to the work. There is nothing more frustrating than playing on a bad sound system that can’t capture your vision, and particularly more annoying if the people running the sound simply do not care much about the work they are performing. As a trained sound professional, this to me is a cardinal sin. Furthermore, I have a very particular sound aesthetic, which has taken a long time and effort to develop (years of studying and researching, beta testing, and in some case just happy accidents happening in the studio). Replicating this live is very challenging, but rewarding when things get done right.

If your personal imagery were a world, how would you describe it?

Empty, quiet and removed from everything and everyone else as it’s lonely when you are amongst people too.

Let’s talk about the festival you are curating. The Substrata Festival took place this year on 18-21 July. Any highlights you’d like to share with us?

The festival was absolutely lovely, with great performances by everyone playing and a very respectful and attentive audience. I don’t like picking highlights as I believe every artist is unique and equal. After all, we are all doing the same thing (art) and the only difference between many of us is just the level of notoriety. There were no “headliners” at the festival and everyone was treated the same way. Incidentally I’ve made it a point to have each evening play out from start to finish and capture your full attention. There were no “fillers” or “warm up” acts at Substrata either. In fact, I really wanted the audience to experience music many probably never heard before and challenge existing preconceptions – some of the artists performing had never even played in Seattle (or the US in some cases) before the event. I like for the listeners to hear something new, something foreign to their ears.

Having said all of that: I was very happy with Grouper’s performance. I’ve played (and toured) with Liz many times over the past 5 years and always loved her sets. When we first started discussing her participation at Substrata 1.3, I asked her to make a special acoustic piano and tape loops set (as opposed to her modus operandi of guitar loops and voice). It really paid off and it was mesmerizing listening to “Alien Observer” on acoustic piano, voice and effects. Wished I had recorded it!

Substrata Fesitval - The Sight Below - Rafael Anton Irisarri

How did the idea of organizing the Substrata Festival arise?

When I started Substrata two years ago, the idea was to create an intimate space for performances in an engaging, collegial environment. I wanted a similar style and format to many of the art festivals I’ve been lucky enough to play in Europe (and beyond) over the last six years. Our tiny event is entirely DIY. We have no corporate sponsors, we don’t “buy talent” from monopolistic booking agencies, we are not scratching anyone’s back: we exist pretty much autonomously in our own little corner of the world. It is truly a community supported event – it simply wouldn’t happen without the kind donations of all our devoted followers in Seattle and abroad. Substrata will never be one those summer festivals with several overlapping events, where you’ll catch a few minutes of an artist’s performance, only to run to the adjacent stage and catch another brief excerpt. I either want your full attention or none at all.

What criteria have you used for building the schedule and line up?

I’ve made some lasting connections with artists and listeners all over the world, while playing shows and touring, and in the process have witnessed some amazing performances by some of my favorite acts. Almost everyone who has played at the festival, I’ve either played with them, seen them live or was connected in some way. I don’t really want to book any artists I’ve never seen before – I want to be able to vouch for their quality and this effort has really worked well, not only from a curatorial standpoint but also on how we’ve been able to build an audience for a very niche kind of music in Seattle. Everyone who donated money to the festival this year did so before they even knew who was playing it, simply trusting my curatorial skills and judgement.

Substrata is as much a reflection of my own artistic pursuits as it is of our collective (Substrata audience) particular (and peculiar) tastes in music and art. As a TinyMixtapes music blog put it last year: “Substrata aims to create artists out of its attendees; it aims to shatter the barriers between the stage for the performers and the viewers. It is very small and personal, only happens once a year, and might be one of the more interesting experiences you are missing.”

I strongly believe that bringing critically-acclaimed international artists and composers to Seattle culturally enriches our local community – after all, it’s not every day you get to experience an artist like Oren Ambarchi, Biosphere, Nils Frahm, Tim Hecker or Scanner up close and see their process.

How important is diplomacy in the music industry?

I’m a brutally honest person and prefer to be treated with the same level of honesty as I treat others. If diplomacy means not been entirely honest, then I guess I’m a bit screwed. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a belligerent person (well, sometimes you have to be in this business, but not for the most part). I don’t think anyone is getting rich here either, it’s important to be polite and treat others respectfully. If you cannot respect someone’s work, then perhaps you shouldn’t work with them. Ultimately if all about building lasting relationships with people you respect, not having a sense of entitlement and knowing that everything you do is a privilege. We are LUCKY this is what we do for work.

Could you say that you are a successful artist? Why? Please share your biggest achievements related to music.

Depends on how you define success. If by success you mean been able to work in this field I love and make a modest living from it, visiting new places and meeting fascinating people whenever possible, then sure thing. My biggest achievements have been able to continue to work doing what I love, working with people I enjoy their company and respect and most importantly, having a loyal listener base that truly appreciates what I do and supports my endeavors whenever possible. Can’t really ask for more. I’m humbled by all of it.

How important is art in your life? Do you have your favourite films directors, painters, fashion designers and other creative acts? Please elaborate on this.

Some people are defined by their race, nationality, sexual orientation, etc. I’m defined by art – from what I do with my own to what I consume by others. It shapes my aesthetic, worldview and outlook. There are many favorite artists to list so I’ll be brief: Jan Svankmajer (filmaker), Horacio Quiroga (writer), Eduardo Txillida Juantegi (sculptor), Kazimir Malevich (painter), and Rei Kawakubo (fashion designer).

Any exciting projects for the future? Could you present them in depth?

At this moment I’m finalizing the next ORCAS (this is my ambient pop music project with singer/songwriter Benoit Pioulard) album for Morr Music. I’m also plotting new European touring dates in the Fall/Winter this year to present a new piece in 4.1 audio setting. All this while working through a stack of remixes and mastering projects in the studio. Busy times!

More about The Sight Below:
WebsiteFacebookFacebook 2

Secret Thirteen Interview – Nils Völker

$
0
0


Secret Thirteen Interview - Nils Volker

PHOTO BY ROBERT WUNSCH

Organic mechanics in industrial fields touched by a brave heart – an informative and rich interview with Nils Völker

Nils Völker (b. 1979) is a Berlin based media artist and communication designer working mainly in the field of physical computing and media art. Völker graduated at Bauhaus University in 2004.

In 2011 Nils realized “Captured – a Homage to Light and Air”, his biggest project so far. Collaborating with his brother Sven Völker and well known MADE platform team, Völker built a temporary installation made from 252 inflatable plastic bags. The whole project is like a mixture of stage setting, performance, installation and exhibition based on light and air interaction. It makes you think, that anything can happen when a machine artist meets a graphic designer.

One Hundred and Eight – Animated Patterns from Nils Völker on Vimeo.

Besides from working on further variations of this series, Nils Völker recently realized “64 CCFL“, a light installation that is mainly made from so called cold cathode fluorescent lights, and “Fountains“, his first public artwork that is now in permanent collection in Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou, China.

Völker’s works definitely do what all art aspires: it captivates an audience and stimulates one’s sense of wonder.

Völker was keen to answer some questions about his working background, early influences, new technologies, progress and other important aspects of this life.

INTERVIEW

What made you to become an artist? Maybe you were directed by your family or your first school teacher?

Actually it was more a series of coincidences as I have never studied art, but used to be a graphic designer for several years. Alongside, I was building little robots and machines just for fun in my free time. Over the time this became more serious and less a hobby as I had the chance to attend the very first exhibitions. So basically, I became an artist by coincidence without planning it from the start.

How important is it to you?

It is pretty important simply because it’s what I spend most of my time with. But although it’s not always easy to make a living as an artist, it’s a great and extremely diversified live working in different fields and meeting people in countries, which I would probably otherwise never have the chance to visit.

64 CCFL from Nils Völker on Vimeo.

Do you feel that you are always in progress with your works? Are you self-critical?

Very often I make site specific installations, so there’s usually quite early a point, when it becomes clear what type of work, what material, colors, and shapes are best for a specific exhibition site. So usually I get rather quick through the process of being not certain or too self-critical. One thing I like about the type of work I do is that there’s always this certain point, when the creative process is mainly thought through and the production starts. Then there’s simply no time left to be self-critical as usually the electronics and programming is too complex to spent any more thoughts on anything else than that.

How does your creative process looks like? What comes first – idea, concept, visuals? Or is just pure experimentation and improvisation?

It’s probably a mixture of everything and differs from project to project. Sometimes I come across certain electronic devices which could be interesting to use which was actually the case with “One Hundred and Eight”. At that time I could get a large amount of very cheap computer cooling fans, so I was experimenting and trying to find something I could use them for. Sometimes the results origin in spontaneous experiments. A while ago I had some circuit boards from a previous project and I was curious what might happen, when I use them to swith a spare background light from a computer screen. Actually, I was rather expecting the whole thing would end up in smoke, but it turned out working way nicer then expected and I built a whole new installation based on this in the end.

Nils Volker - Working  background

Could you talk about a significant success or a noteworthy failure that was an important turning point in your career?

There hasn’t been such thing like this one major turning point in my life, but there are constantly points coming up when the direction slightly changes. So becoming an artist was a long row of such opportunities and coincidences and, personally, I like to rather be flexible and take opportunities when they pop up than to have a longterm plan for the rest of my life.

Who are some of your favorite installation artists working today? Why do they draw your attention?

That’s very difficult to answer, basically because there are too many interesting artists. Personally, I’m not only interested in artists, who work in the exact same field as I do so it’s a wide range of artists and designers, which make great and inspiring work. But also “old” art can be very inspiring. So, for example, for my last solo exhibition I did some research on impressionist art as the exhibition was part of the “Festival Normandie Impressionniste” which is, as the name says, mostly about Impressionism but includes some contemporary art as well.

What other art forms or artists inspire you? Where do you find most inspiration in general?

This can be pretty much everything – from a certain electronic device I come across, a recently visited exhibition, blogs, …

How do you see the future of arts? Does the artists needs to focus more on technological progress or interactive expression?

No, I wouldn’t say so in general. There are so many different fields and many of them are doing great without the use of any technology. But of course, there are more and more new technologies, materials and processes that now become affordable and usable, so I’m sure it has an influence on artists as well and not only in my field. But unfortunately, a few forget that solely using the latest technology or fancy materials doesn’t necessarily lead to great works.

Eighty Eight #2 from Nils Völker on Vimeo.

Thirty Three from Nils Völker on Vimeo.

Do you see any limitations in nowadays technology that work as an obstructions to your ideas or concepts? Do you often face the situation, when you cannot realize your concept or idea fully due to some technical limitations? And do you have any dream projects, that wouldn’t be possible to realize due to above mentioned reasons?

Usually, it’s not the technology, which is limited, but rather my own knowledge about technology and electronics, which is very limited. I approach every new work pretty blue-eyed, expecting that everything is possible. Which usually turns out to be true, but way more difficult and time-consuming than expected.

Where can someone see your work? Any shows coming up in the near future? We are curious to know.

There was a solo show “Thirty Three” in an old church in Caen, France, that has just closed. There’s also a very nice group exhibition open taking place until the 6th of October at the Mudac in Lausanne, Switzerland including one of my installations called “Eighty Eight #2“.

What is your advice for beginner artists?

Don’t care too much about advices from others.

More about Nils Völker:
WebsiteVimeo

Secret Thirteen Interview – Lorenzo Durantini

$
0
0


portrait copy

Creative insights and playful mind – the special interview with Lorenzo Durantini

Lorenzo Durantini is an Italian artist, writer, curator and occasional DJ who lives and works in London, United Kingdom. He received a BA in Photographic Arts at the University of Westminster and attended the MA programme at Royal College of Art before dropping out to pursue his career full-time. Durantini’s practice as an artist started with political activism and documentary photography, to which he has recently returned with a piece called Vada a bordo, cazzo!, that depicts the Costa Concordia shipwreck off the coast of Isola del Giglio. that depicts the Costa Concordia shipwreck off the coast of Isola del Giglio. Durantini was part of an art squat group around 2010, that occupied abandoned buildings in London and repurposed them into multifaceted artist-run spaces. His work from that period included various creative experimentations with old VHS tapes. In specific works such as “2,216 VHS Tapes” and “445,368 meters” he uses old VHS and audio tapes to build towers, flood rooms with meters of tape or simply make a statement about the chaos of the digital era we live in. His notable curated shows are “Brush It In“, “Ristruttura” and “re:control“.

445,368 metres by Lorenzo Durantini

In this exclusive interview for Secret Thirteen Lorenzo Durantini reveals his early influences, insights about current working background, favourite books, impressing artists and future plans.

INTERVIEW

What are some of your most important influences or events that lead you to become an artist?

My practice as an artist started with political activism and documentary photography, something which I have recently returned to with a piece called Vada a bordo, cazzo! that depicts the Costa Concordia shipwreck off the coast of Isola del Giglio. I grew up close to New York, so I think 9/11 had the strongest impact on my decision to work with images. I moved back to Italy two months before the attack and the television coverage of the event along with the political repercussions it had on US foreign policy deeply affected me in ways, that I am still coming in terms with.

Lorenzo Durantini - Vada a bordo cazzo

Vada a bordo, cazzo! 376x300cm Vinyl & 188x150cm Inkjet.

Could you talk about a significant success or a noteworthy failure that was an important turning point in your career?

I was part of an art squat group around 2010 that would occupy abandoned buildings in London and repurpose them into multifaceted artist-run spaces. The occupations were always very high profile – a 40 room building in Leicester Square, a 4 story warehouse behind Tate Modern and a nightclub in a former church in Soho that recently sold for something ridiculous like £10 million. The sense of accomplishment and freedom that those exhibitions gave me is what motivated me to try and make a career out of art.

3312 Hours and 129231 metres

3,312 Hours and 129,231 metres by Lorenzo Durantini.

1123 Hours and 83403 metres

1,123 Hours and 83,403 metres by Lorenzo Durantini.

What is your studio practice like? Can you describe the process of making your work? Do you start work with a concept in mind or does the idea come later?

I think the most fruitful part of my practice are the conversations I have with other artists since I’m also active as curator. Whenever I make work, it’s usually very quickly and is usually tied to sense of inevitability, that I couldn’t possibly not make the work as opposed to consciously wanting to make it. I spend more time thinking about what I don’t want to make then I usually do making.

Tower no. 5

Tower no 5 by Lorenzo Durantini. VHS Cassettes. 350 x 80 x 80 cm.

Tower no. 4

Tower no. 4 VHS Cassettes by Lorenzo Durantini. 250 x 110 x 110cm.

How do you see your art from objective point of view? Did your works somehow (technologically, emotionally or sociologically) improve in the last 2-3 years? How do you see your art’s enduring value? Are you self-critical?

Hah! that’s a cannonball of a question. Let’s just say that I’ve gotten better at using certain tools over the last few years. but I don’t think the core of my practice has really shifted that much. Art has no intrinsic value apart from it’s contingent social utility, so I think it’s impossible to look at art objectively without first examining the social conditions that create it.

Colorama Study no. 1

Colorama Study by Lorenzo Durantini.

Colorama Study no. 2

Colorama Study by Lorenzo Durantini.

Does excellent work guarantee the recognition? How important these days are good promotion and support from galleries? Any advice for future or emerging artists?

Occupy everything! Realistically demand the impossible.

Like Jim Jarmusch said “Nothing is original.” Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination. Devour old films, new films, music, books, paintings, photographs, poems, dreams, random conversations, architecture, bridges, street signs, trees, clouds, bodies of water, light and shadows. Select only things to steal from that speak directly to your soul. If you do this, your work (and theft) will be authentic. Authenticity is invaluable; originality is non-existent. And don’t bother concealing your thievery – celebrate it if you feel like it. In any case, always remember what Jean-Luc Godard said: “It’s not where you take things from – it’s where you take them to.”

The Wrong Door

The Wrong Door. Digital C-type 100 x 120cm.

Who are your top three artists in terms of how they influenced your work? Can you give us a few examples of their works too and which aspects of these works draw your attention.

Michelangelo Antonioni and the end of Zabriskie Point (1970), where he explodes the interiors of a bourgeois house at 1000 fps including a television, a bookcase, a fridge and a closet in the Californian desert. It’s set to Pink Floyd’s “Careful with That Axe, Eugene”. As far as I’m aware it was the first time a director was able to make such abstract experimental and politically charged images at the expense of a major Hollywood studio (MGM).

Jean-Luc Godard and all of Tout Va Bien (1970). This film finally coalesces Godard’s political research with his Dziga-Vertov period and is the most masterful adaptation of Brecht’s concept of Verfremdungseffekt or the alienation or distancing effect according to different translations. The film is again a high budget and includes in my opinion the most epic 9 minute tracking shot inside a supermarket where a group of activists perform proletarian expropriation of consumer goods.

Fischli & WeissDer Lauf der Dinge (1987). This film must be seen to be understood, but essentially does many of the things that the above films achieve, but with a minimal budget. It’s a lesson in economy of means for achieving poetically strong images. It’s relationship to Arte Povera is also particularly relevant for me.

What activities, apart from other visual arts, influence your art?

Lovers & electronic music.

What is your favorite art book? In general, what role books (educational, poetry, science fiction etc.) play in you life?

I’ll give you another top 3:

Books

Art Power by Boris Groys. Most brilliant paradoxical exploration of how power works within the art world.

Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller. This novel is what made me start writing poetry.

Capitalist Realism by Mark Fisher. This slim volume of critical theory along with a lecture that Mark gave on the same topic is the reason, why I dropped out of one of the most prestigious art schools in London. In hindsight, the best decision I could have ever made for my practice.

Tell us your favourite musicians and albums you always listen with pleasure. Is music at all important in your daily routine?

Over the last year I’ve started making quite bit of live visuals for music artists like Holy Other and SBTRKT.

Right now as I’m writing this I’m listening to the compilation 5 years of Hyperdub with “Spliff Dub” by Zomby currently on deck.

SBTRKT DJ Live Visuals (excerpt) by Lorenzo Durantini

What are you working on now? What ideas or plans do you have for your future work?

I’m going to make a film about the rebuilding of One World Trade Center, a post-war female financier who was about as powerful as Maria de Medici, Silvio Berlusconi, Jackie Kennedy, Aristotle Socrates Onassis, Giorgio Armani and the anti-austerity movement in Greece.

More about Lorenzo Durantini:
WebsiteTwitterTwitter

Secret Thirteen Interview - Ran Slavin

$
0
0


Ran Slavin Interview Photo

PHOTO BY SHLOMIT SLAVIN

Floating between dream and reality, traveling through time and space – an exclusive interview with Ran Slavin

Ran Slavin is an Israeli based multimedia artist, director and composer. His works occupy some surreal space between dreams and reality, archaic past and futurism, cold cyber/urban landscapes and human emotions, rational and subconscious. In his cinematic masterpiece “The Insomniac City Cycles“, he analyzes the moving, evolving, alive and multilayered organism of the city and its relation to our (sub)consciousness, identity, inner relations. The city becomes like an alien structure, yet filled with inhabitants struggling for human contact. No wonder Ran’s art was given such tags as relation art or urban surrealism. In “Ursulimum“, another notable video work, the artist explores the relation between archaic past and futurism, the ever evolving concept of history and cultural landscape. Ran’s works frequently transcend the ethereal mood, but in a very modern, almost futuristic way.

The Insomniac City Cycles by Ran Slavin.

Similar qualities can be attributed to Ran’s sonic works. His abstract and cinematic compositions float like elegant and diverse drone/ambient/field recording waves full of unexpected narrative turns. Having produced the excellent mix for our journal, Ran also provided some interesting insight and thoughts in this exclusive interview.

Right-click and save a copy of Ran Slavin mix

Tracklist:
01. Svarte Greiner – The Boat Was My Friend
02. Strië – Fragments Of The Past
03. G.H. – Ground (Modern Love)
04. Dale Cooper Quartet And The Dictaphones – Mon Tragique Chartreuse
05. Ran Slavin – Triggers Of Violence
06. Erik K Skodvin – Neither Dust
07. G.H. – Albedo
08. G.H. – Earth
09. Svarte Greiner – Baandspiller I Solnedgang
10. Stina Nordenstam – Come To Me
11. Strië – Crack in the Boards
12. Murcof featuring Erik Truffaz – Al Mediodia
13. Strië – Substraction
14. Ran Slavin – Unreleased
15. Ran Slavin – Unreleased

INTERVIEW

Silence is one of the most important components of sound construction. What does the silence mean to you? Is it a blank canvass or a component of sound? Collaborator or powerful rival that needs to be challenged? Do you more enjoy silence or the presence of the sound and how is it reflected in your music?

I love silence. I strive for silence. Silence is the utmost beauty. It is a signifier of concentration and purity. In that sense, I think it is both a component and a canvas.

Sound quality can be measured objectively, such as when tools are used to gauge the accuracy with which the device reproduces an original sound; or it can be measured subjectively, such as when human listeners respond to the sound or gauge, its perceived similarity to another sound. What do you think the qualitative sound is and what it consists of? How much attention do you pay to sound quality in your own music? What would be your example of quality in music?

I think quality in sound is a very wide, open and subjective topic. There are many angles of it. Every form of sound has a certain quality in my perception. A destroyed sound and a well produced sound, for example. It’s a wide spectrum and I can appreciate many forms. I think it’s not about the quality in sound, but what you DO with sound.

For example, a delta blues track by Blind Willie Johnson or Robert Johnson is great despite and also because of the bad recording.

I tend to play with these parameters of “bad” and “good” in my own tracks. I usually fall in love with the “wrong” sound and go with it, so it’s interesting for me to make a beautiful and compelling/touching track with grained “unsounds”. The inner tensions there interest me.

Which part of your music is calculated/constructed and which is more influenced by emotions? What is more important in (your) music: brain or heart? How do they complement each other? Is there more contradiction or collaboration between them?

Usually, my music isn’t calculated. It sort of happens sometimes, when it happens. That is to say, I don’t plan it, so in my music I would say it’s all heart or chance or both. It starts with the heart and the subconscious and then the brain comes in to shape and make order. So sometimes it is more raw and emotional, but usually it is under control. I don’t make much music, although I have 4 unreleased albums just sitting there and waiting to be published with material from my Mille Plateaux era, which hasn’t grown old and I think sounds pretty cool, but I don’t know what’s going on with labels anymore, who would be interested etc. My next idea is to release them one after the other with only 3 month interval between each other. I feel like actually releasing then, not putting them out on bandcamp. Maybe digital releases.

Could you describe your creative process?

I might have a few sound files from God knows when on my machine and they make their way into some editing program or other. Then I will start to fiddle around, layer them and shape them slowly or quickly into tracks.

Or I record some guitar in 2009 and come back to those sounds in 2013 with an intent. Or I hear a track or sound I like on the new and grab it for integration in my own composition. Sometimes soundtracks present themselves from shards of material that’s floating around. I used to be a lot less ambient then I am in the last years. My pro tools sessions used to look like very complicated, condensed, multichopped files.

Can you describe from beginning to end how the material – let’s say a new album – is made?

Ran Slavin - Showing Light

Showing Light / Ran Slavin / New on False Industries

“Showing Light” was born very quickly, in one session. It happened like this: I was preparing a live show, arranging some files for possible live stuff and then something went off and few files were playing at once, that sounded altogether new and beautiful to me, some new combination between a few existing sound files, so I thought why not keep it? About 5 or 6 tracks unfolded this way and I just seized them in real time. I hardly needed to add anything to them later, I liked and preserved the original muffled low ends and kind of murky initial studio feel. I didn’t want to “open” it or fix in mastering as well. This kind of thing happened to me many times before, when after the mastering and the music is printed and all, I suddenly hear the first edition of the track and love it and feel some “truth” was lost. The file before it was eq’d and mastered. So here I was aware of it and maintained the basics throughout.

Describe where the sound concept comes from, what influenced you, how you came up with the timbre, modulations or mood, how it was developed and expanded?

Most of my sounds come from some sort of mistake or misintention. A glitch in a broad sense. I hardly work methodically and come up a prior with a concept and then set about to do it. When I’m at work and I get carried away, when something makes me forget time and place, when something is beautiful to me, then it might feel like it’s worth a print. When it comes together, music is like meditation. You need it on chemical and biological scale, you are one with it. That’s a good signifier for good music or any art, when you lose yourself.



What is the meaning behind the album’s title “Showing Light”?

I’m glad you asked. “Showing Light” refers to 2 things. One is a spiritual level, you might say, but also ironically. To show light is like to show or produce something good and optimistic, that helps others like in religion phenomena, but the tracks sound far from light, they are actually quite dark, but I find a lot of hope in there. For me this LP is close to early blues and gospel in a personal and subjective way. It won’t sound like that to you automatically at all, but it’s there somewhere. This release is about hope in some way or other. I also wanted the cover to portray this direction and resemble early delta blues LP covers. Nice photo by my mate Yuval Robichek, which was done in a snap and unintentionally and design by Tuvia Kudashevich.

The second interpretation relates to my video work. Half of the tracks here found their way into my video works, and “Showing Light” refers to the physicality of what I do, when I make exhibitions. When I project a video work in exhibitions and live performances, I show light.

What are your immediate future plans?

I am working on series of new video materials daily. I wake up and sit in the studio working for about 10-12 hours daily, if I’m lucky not to be interrupted.

I’m taking part in an exhibition in Hannover at KunstHalle Faust with 2 video works and a live performance at the opening. Also live video performances in Tel Aviv at “The store” and at “Pasaz” in September and October and screening in Uganda in Jerusalem.

Technological progress is unstoppable indeed. Probably no major innovator from the past could imagine how much we will achieve in the 20th century. The Wright brothers first flight was in 1903 and in 1969 Apollo 11 landed on the moon! Transistor invented in 1948 later changed our daily life as one of the basic building blocks of electronic circuits. Are you interested in technologies and their progress? What have made you the biggest impression over the past century? Maybe you have your personal vision of the world after couple of years? Maybe you think that technologies will bring humanity to an end? Share your thoughts.

Ursulimum by Ran Slavin.

I am very much interested in technology to the extent of science fiction. Most of my visual work is about technology in this way or the other and touches sci-fi. I think Apple made a huge change in course with Steve Job’s vision. He changed the way we live, work, and interact with each other. Personal computers are the biggest tools of our decade, I think, unarguably.

I’m interested in second life. This avatar social environment is quite fantastic and futuristic. These interactive virtual 3D environments are fun and could be taken to the next level somehow. Imagine a room, where all the walls are LED screens with whatever you want on them. Like the vision from “Cloud Atlas” film of the future. I’m a sucker for cyberpunk environments from back when I was 16 and saw “Blade Runner” for the first time.

As far as we know, for the most of your life you lived in Tel Aviv in Israel. Have you ever felt a need to move somewhere else, experience the living in other country. How important is home, your own cultural space to you? How does it influence your music?

I grew up and lived in the USA, London and shortly in Singapore. All have influenced me. I love London and Europe, Asia and New York. But yes, for the most it has been Tel Aviv and even Jerusalem.

I feel the need to move constantly and I love moving. I think its a basic instinct to move and be free to roam. The experience and multicultures are enriching and vital. Whenever I can, I will move. With Israel, my current location, I have a deeply ambivalent relationship. A political ambivalence and a humanistic one. I know so many mistakes were done and afflicted on an unnecessary scale on the way to form the state. The “culture space” needs to constantly be scrutinized and reevaluated, because democracy and human rights are constantly at threat and under attack. So one needs to stay on guard. And I’m also constantly observing. And the middle eastern “neighborhood” is a very fragile barrel of dynamite. So my natural tendency and interest in ephemeral topics like ambient sound and science fiction might have a strong friction with reality.

Clint Eastwood once said “This film cost $31 million. With that kind of money I could have invaded some country”. What would be your vision? What genre would you like to develop, maybe there are some books you would like to see as films? Could you tell us, have you ever had some ideas for movie and what do nowadays cinema lacks in general?

Ghost by Ran Slavin. 2013.

Well, the main aspiration is to make my next movie. I’m constantly struggling to make it happen. I have two ideas for future films, which I am developing and new strange mini series under way.

Regarding the cinema, there are great movies coming out all the time. “Headshot” by Pen-Ek Ratanaruang is a really great film, also “The Raid Redemption”, “Holy Motors”, “Yellow Sea”, “Invisible Waves”, “Hit&Miss” series, “Breaking Bad”, “Big Bad Wolves” and many many more.

Sculpture is the most popular form of visual art in Africa. What place does the sculpture occupy in your life? Do you pay attention to sculptures in cities, showcases, galleries and other spaces? Maybe you have your most impressive one? Which one and why? Or maybe you are not interested in this form of art at all?

I love sculpture, but I don’t make it anymore. I used to sculpt and make casts in the 90′s with concrete wax and light. I’m interested in sculpture, but I’m all digital now and actually about non-material. I just think there are so many objects out in the world, so many things, I just don’t feel the need to add any more. I’m going for reduction.

Mr. Slavin, in your opinion, what is the meaning of modern art?

Modern Art is an old term, isn’t it? In the 60′s it was Modern Art. When I hear the word Modern Art, I’m reminded of the 60′s-70′s era.

Austrian Felix Baumgartner reached the boundary between atmosphere and space and jumped down, thus exceeding the speed of sound. Are you influenced by record breaking in general? If there would be no restricting factors, what meaningful and deeply influential record would you like to break?

Not influenced by record breaking. I don’t think about it at all, but an influential record would be to be able to travel at the speed of light and to travel both forward and backward in time. Also to discover space loop holes, and some other livable sun systems. Discovering alternative life to human system or expanding human systems into something else, challenging natural biology and the integration of human DNA and biology with technology.

What is your meaning of life?

I don’t know. Feeling well, making films and video, travel as much as possible, work hard, make amazing things, keep discovering, following your dreams.

More about Ran Slavin: WebsiteFacebookVimeo

Secret Thirteen Interview - Nate Young

$
0
0


Nate Young

“Silence as the paramount to the effectiveness of loud noise” – Nate Young interviewed

Nate Young is one of the busiest artists in nowadays noise/experimental underground. Not only he has founded the legendary Wolf Eyes outfit, but also performed under a wide variety of monikers (Jean Street, Regression etc.) and in a great number of different acts (Stare Case, The Moon Pool & Dead Band, The Mongoloid Men etc). One of his most notable achievements is the renowned “Regression” series – his most refined effort melting the contemporary explorations of silence, intense sonic fear, vintage and horrific analog synth soundscapes, cinematic drones and noisy sound walls. Nate’s music is like a complex audio structure filled with unexpected narratives and twists. His live performances capture his artistic intention very well and requires concentrated, attentive listening and participation.

On the 10th of October Nate Young will appear in Latvian experimental music festival Skaņu Mežs, where he will perform his soundtrack for the Latvian movie “Naves Ena” (“In The Shadow of Death”). It is fascinating to see such unexpected collaboration and to hear Nate’s soundtrack made for our neighbors. Prior to the performance in Riga Secret Thirteen journal made this exclusive interview with Nate. Here he talked about the challenges of the beforementioned collaboration, the power and importance of silence, nowadays noise scene, analog revolution and, of course, the present and future directions of his own musical path.

Interview

Could you tell us more about your project for Latvian movie “Naves Ena” (“In The Shadow of Death”). How did you become involved into it and how it developed?

I was approached by Viestarts Gailitis from Skaņu Mežs to do a live score for “Naves Ena”. I have always wanted to do soundtracks for film and this seemed like a great opportunity. The first thing I asked was to see a copy of the film, I could not find a copy in Michigan. When I first watched “Naves Ena” I was overwelmed by how great the original soundtrack and dialogue are. The idea of making a new score for such a perfect film was daunting. The first experiment I did was playing my new record “Blinding Confusion” along to the film. I immediately realized why Viestarts asked me to do this project. My music went very well with the ice landscape and feelings of dread. The scenes in the film seem to add new emotional depth to my music that I had not experimented with before – pride, family and naive innocence lost.

What could we expect from your live show in Skaņu Mežs? And what do you expect from the audience out there?

I had a new edit made of “Naves Ena” with the artist Alivia Zivich. We worked together to make a new cut of the entire film from beginning to end. This was done to be able to experience the entire story with in 32-40mins performance. This film is very emotionally dark and extremely sad, I can not expect anything from the audience, but patience, focus and maybe some water works a.k.a. tears.

You created a soundtrack for the before mentioned movie. What was the biggest challenge in making a soundtrack? What new challenges did you face? How was the process different from making non-soundtrack music?

I think the biggest challenge I had with making the soundtrack was timing. When I compose something for listening only, the duration of musical sequences are quicker and more related to time signatures. This is very different to scoring a soundtrack for a film. The music needs to linger and absorb the mood of the films sequences. I think that synesthesia also helps bind the audio and visual no matter how out of synch the two may be.

Your music is very intense and dynamic with various sonic/noise layers. But how do you understand the concepts of silence and noise? Do they contradict or contribute to each other? Which is more important to you when creating and in general?

Yes, Wolf Eyes is intense and layered with textural dive bombs, but my solo work with the Regression series focuses on the building of tension through silence. Silence is paramount to the effectiveness of loud noise. When I write music for any project, I look for a foundation that can easily contrast the individual players moods and tones. This helps maintain a static exchange that naturally creates dynamics. I try not to force anything, but rather set up scenes that can organically exist and freely change without losing shape. Silence is essential to this process, it adds duration to the static.

What is the usual process of composing a track? Do you more rely on improvisation or careful pre-planning? How do you perform them live?

I usually start composing by choosing rhythmic drum tones. Then I choose a complementary bass tone. After I have a simple bass and drum sequence established I start improvising with random instruments and try replacing the original tones with other unexpected sounds. I rely on both careful planning, total destruction and mutation. The same process is used live, but with more per-conceived improvisational elements.

What emotions do you try to channel in your music? What emotions inspire you to create or is it more spontaneous creations influenced by daily discoveries (arts, books, stories etc.)?

What I have been trying to do lately is make something beautiful sounding, something that you listen to daily, something that stays with you. I have noticed that what is beautiful to me is not so pretty to others. HA! It is hard to describe what influences me to create, I think it can be emotional, but I also get inspired by the mechanics of electronic music and science in general. The signal flow of synthesis and what can be done with science can be just as emotionally engaging as a scary movie, sad book, or a lose.

Apart from your solo work and Wolf Eyes, you have a great number of side projects and monikers. Could you tell us the reason for that and how all this developed? How does it represent your artistic whole? Is it difficult to split your material between so many projects or does it happen organically?

Having other outlets to express new ideas has helped maintain a constant tone or mood in each band of mine. It is only natural to have different ideas and different goals for yourself. The only difficulty has been people wanting me to perform in all my different bands in one night. I am up to the challenge but I need at-least three days to do it best.

You have been involved in experimental/noise scene for more than 15 years. What significant changes occurred during those years?

Popularity of experimental music rises and falls every year, but we saw it get very popular in the mid 2000′s. Noise became an umbrella for everyone to stand together under. This was fun, then people started to form new sub-genres, noise became high art and smart music started to not like dumb music and so on. Hahahaha! Nothing has really changed…

Noise/experimental music recently gained some indie/mainstream media attention with such bands as Pharmakon, Fuck Buttons, Black Dice. What is your opinion on that?

No opinion, I like Pharmakon and Black Dice, never heard the Fuck Buttons.

What is your opinion about the new media (internet, social media) and its relation to underground experimental scene? Does it help to develop or maybe just flood the scene with lots of mediocre acts just posting their music online? How did it influence your own relation to the scene?

Show me your nude photos before you show me your mediocre tape. Social media is just high school on a global level. I actually had a blast in high school, but I got kicked out for skateboarding and not going to class, so…

As far as we know, you mostly rely on analog equipment. Nowadays we face the revival of it happening in many scenes. Why do you think it is happening and will it last long? What do you think will be next? How do you imagine yourself in this context?

I love the analog revolution we are going through! I can buy analog synths new and at a reasonable price. I just bought a KORG MINI MS 20. I could never afford an MS-20, even in the 80′s they where more than they are now. I use everything I can get my hands on. People seem to believe that analog circuits have small organic beings living inside them. This is not true, the inside of an analog circuit looks almost identical to a digital one. I love having real-time control over my synthesizers, this means I love knobs. Some digital synths have knobs but most do not, that is why I choose analog.

What are your future plans? Some interesting collaborations, releases?

I am going to record two new LP’s December-January. One LP will be Regression and the other will be for Wolf Eyes. I will tour the world again starting in March 2014.

More about Nate Young: WebsiteFacebookSoundcloud

Viewing all 60 articles
Browse latest View live